ARTICLE   Open Access    

Molecular identification of indigenous pectinolytic bacteria characterized for starter culture in coffee fermentation

More Information
  • From cherries to green beans, coffee undergoes a post-harvest fermentation process. The quality of coffee is influenced by the origin and microbiological activities that drive coffee fermentation, particularly pectin hydrolysis. Coffee-associated pectinolytic microorganisms have been isolated and characterized to explore their potential as starter cultures for coffee fermentation. This study characterizes the indigenous pectinolytic bacteria for starter cultures, which were isolated during the wet fermentation of Coffea arabica cherries. A total of five indigenous bacteria had the ability to produce pectinase enzymes with solubilization index ranging 3.75−5.33 and enzymatic activity ranging 1.22−1.268 μmol min−1. Interestingly, these bacteria showed amylase, cellulase, and protease activity in addition to pectinase. All of them are capable of fermenting multiple sugars and releasing acids. Moreover, they tolerate a wide range of fermentation stress (i.e., temperature, pH, salt, and alcohol). Based on the 16S rRNA gene sequencing, they were designated as Chryseobacterium bernardetii (P5B3.4 and P3TA.1), Chryseobacterium indologenes (P5TC.3), Enterobacter hormaechei (P5TA.4), and Klebsiella variicola (P3TD.5). The genera of these pectinolytic bacterial species are part of coffee microbiota and found to be associated with coffee cherries. Thus, they pose potential use for starter culture in coffee fermentation in the Philippines.
  • The pomegranate (Punica granatum L.), a berry of the pomegranate family (Punicaceae), is a medicinal and edible fruit[1]. In addition to numerous vitamins and minerals[2], pomegranates are also rich in valuable bioactive substances, including anthocyanins, carotenoids, tannins, polyphenols[3], and flavonoids[4]. It is proven that these substances have anti-diabetic, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant[5], anti-tumour, anti-hyperglycaemia, and anti-hypertensive properties in vivo and in vitro[6].

    Pomegranates are highly sensitive to temperature and are typically stored in cold storage at a range of 0−5 °C[7]. Higher temperatures lead to obvious water loss, browning, and decay. While, under unfavorable low temperatures condition, the fruits are vulnerable to chilling injury (CI), thus leading to metabolic disorder and decay during post-harvest storage[8]. Besides, low temperature fluctuation (LTF) ranging from ± 0.1 to ± 0.2 °C was discovered to significantly alleviate the CI in peach during 60 d of storage, as opposed to a temperature fluctuation ranging from ± 0.5 to ± 1 °C[9]. Similarly, LTF storage was demonstrated to be an effective approach to maintaining flesh quality and retarding water core dissipation in 'Fuji' apples[10]. There are many publications revealing that the occurrence of CI is accompanied by an increase in oxidative enzyme levels, including polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and peroxidase (POD) activity, as well as total phenolics. Specifically, the chilling temperatures exerted a stimulating effect on the activities of PPO and POD and resulted in a decrease in the content of phenolic substances in olives[11] and peaches[12].

    It is well known that the membranes guarantee the biochemical and physiological reactions are carried out orderly and efficiently[13]. There is a hypothesis that CI begins with internal cell membrane injury. Kong et al.[14] proposed that the increased incidence of CI in bell peppers is accompanied by enhanced membrane permeability, and it was further demonstrated that the incidence of CI is closely related to the integrity of the cell membrane. Likewise, Wang et al.[15] found more malondialdehyde (MDA) accumulated along with CI occurrence in peaches. Also, the impaired function of cell membranes led to an insufficient supply of metabolic energy, which was closely associated with respiratory abnormalities. This led to the excessive buildup of MDA and reactive oxygen species (ROS)[16]. The accumulation of these harmful substances disrupted a series of physiological and metabolic disturbances, ultimately resulting in further exacerbation of the development of CI symptoms[17].

    To date, a diversity of methods have been explored to mitigate the CI among pomegranates and other fruits. Physical treatment for controlling CI is primarily achieved through temperature conditioning[18], near-freezing temperature storage[19], and heat treatment[20]. A study in which sweet potato tuberous roots were pre-cooled at 10 °C for 5 d before cold storage demonstrated that low-temperature conditioning could inhibit the CI progression[21]. Fan et al.[22] proved that the near-freezing point temperature of 0 °C extended the storage time of apricot from 45 to 90 d without CI symptoms. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that pomegranates were soaked with hot water at 45 °C for 4 min, and subsequently stored at 2 °C for 3 months, leading to a significantly reduced incidence of CI symptoms[23]. Additionally, chemical treatments, such as sodium nitroprusside[24], hydrogen sulfide[15], brassinolides[25], and 1-MCP[26] are also the research hotspots for mitigating CI among fruits and vegetables.

    Although many techniques have been proposed to reduce CI and increase storage-ability, the temperature always remains the key environmental factor that governs the extent of CI. An appropriate and precise preservation temperature prominently maintains pomegranate physiological quality[27,28]. Further, it has been observed that the chilling injury of pomegranates was remarkably different in different cultivars and different harvest periods[20]. While there are few researches on the influence of precise storage temperature for 'Mengzi' pomegranate. This research investigated the optimal temperature for 'Mengzi' pomegranate during 130 d of storage. Not only their storage parameters were determined, but also the indicators related to micro-structure and ROS-redox balance in all storage temperatures were evaluated. The aim is to provide a reference for the long-term commercial storage of 'Mengzi' pomegranates.

    The 'Mengzi' pomegranates (Punica granatum L.) were harvested at 80% maturation (the color of pomegranate surface was green-red, and the single fruit weight was 330−350 g) in October from the Heyuan Ten Thousand Acres Pomegranate Manor of Honghezhou Heyuan Agricultural Development Co., Ltd located at Liwu Village, Jianshui County, Honghezhou City, Yunnan Province, China (23°37′32″ N, 102°49′16″ E). Then they were wrapped with single-fruit net bags, placed in foam boxes with ice packs (the ice packs were covered with a foaming net), and airlifted to the Agricultural Products Processing and Preservation Laboratory of Tianjin University of Science and Technology (Tianjin, China). To ensure the transportation environment was as uniform as possible, the same ice packs, and the same quantity of pomegranates were placed in each box during cold chain transportation. With a bright red color, uniform size, smooth surface, no mechanical lesions, no cracks and no disease spots, pomegranates were selected for the experiment. After pre-cooling at 3 °C for 12 h, the samples were packaged into 0.02 mm PE bags, containing 20 samples per bag. Each treatment comprised 10 bags and were subsequently stored at 0 ± 0.2 °C, 1 ± 0.2 °C, 2 ± 0.2 °C, 3 ± 0.2 °C, and 4 ± 0.2 °C, respectively.

    The CI indicator was evaluated in light of the proportion and severity of visible symptoms area[29]. Fifteen individual fruits were taken and calculated using five grades and the following formula: 0 = no CI, 1 = slight (0 < CI ≤ 5%), 2 = regular (5% < CI ≤ 15%), 3 = moderate (15% < CI ≤ 25%); 4 = severe (CI > 25%).

    The BI indicator was evaluated, in light of the browning area. The extent of BI was categorized into these five levels given the approach of Luo et al.[30]: 0 = no BI, 1 = slight (0 < BI ≤ 10%), 2 = regular (10% < BI ≤ 25%), 3 = moderate (25% < BI ≤ 50%), 4 = severe (> 50%). The BI indicator was computed as below:

    L*, a*, b* and ΔE*, as peel colour parameters, were assessed through a color meter (HP-200, China). Decay incidence was the ratio of decay fruits to the total fruits denoted as per
    Gao et al.[12].

    Microscopic morphology of pomegranate peel was observed based on the approach of Andrade et al.[31]. Several pieces of pomegranate husk (5 mm × 5 mm) were randomly cut and fixed in 4% glutaraldehyde solution (pH 6.8) prepared with 0.1 mol·L−1 phosphate buffer. After 3 h, they were rinsed with 0.1 mol·L−1 phosphate buffer three times and subsequently dehydrated using isoamyl acetate for 20 min. Finally, the specimens were freeze-dried using one vacuum freezing dryer (FD-1A-50, China) for 1 d. The slices were sprayed with gold sputtering coater for 60 s and then were observed with SEM (LEO, Germany).

    Similarly, the microstructure of pomegranate samples was observed in accordance with the approach of Kato et al.[32] with some adjustments. Pomegranate peel tissue samples were cut into cubes with the size of 1 cm3 and fixed in FAA solution (5% acetic acid, 40% formaldehyde, and 70% ethanol) at low temperatures (4 °C). After 48 h, the samples were successively put into 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, and 100% ethanol solutions (2 h per solution) for dehydration. Subsequently, the samples were successively put into 100% alcohol: 100% xylene (1:1) solution, 100% xylene, and 100% xylene solution (1.5 h per solution) for transparency. After that, the samples were placed in xylene: paraffin (1:1) solution, and subsequently embedded in pure paraffin. Once solidified, the paraffin wax was cut into pieces with 10 μm in thickness. Finally, the slices were stained with eosin solution and micro-photographed using an inverted fluorescence microscope (TE2-PS, Japan).

    The permeability of the cell membrane was assessed according to the method of Guo et al.[33] with some adjustments. Ten cylindrical tissue samples (10 mm in diameter) were extracted from pomegranate peel using one punch and rinsed three times using distilled water. Then, tissues were placed in a triangular bottle containing distilled water (20 mL) at 25 °C for 1 h. The initial conductivity P1 was determined through one digital conductometer (DDS-11A, China). Subsequently, the specimen was boiled for 10 min and then cooled at 25 °C. The conductivity of P2 was determined. The conductivity of distilled water was P0. The cell membrane permeability (%) = (P1 - P0) × 100 / (P2 - P0). Throughout the entire process, all utensils were rinsed with distilled water, and the slice samples were not touched directly by hand. Before measurements, the electrode was calibrated using a blank solution. Additionally, before each measurement, the electrode was rinsed with distilled water and then washed with the liquid to be measured three times.

    Respiratory rate was measured through one fruit and vegetable respiration detector (FS-GH100, China). The results were represented in CO2 mg·kg−1·h−1. Specifically, after weighted, one pomegranate fruit was placed into an air-tight jar (1 L) and detected at room temperature (25 °C) for 3 min. Then the respiration rate was calculated automatically by inputting the weight of the pomegranate. Weight loss was measured as the distinction between the initial weight and the weight of each storage time, then divided by initial weight.

    MDA concentration of pomegranates was measured according to the method of Si et al.[34]. As well as pomegranate peel (5 g), 10% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) solution (10 mL) was taken into pre-cooled mortar and ground into homogenizing pulp under the condition of ice bath. After grinding, the homogenizing pulp was centrifuged at 5,000× g for 10 min under 4 °C. Two mL supernatant was blended with 0.6% of 2 mL thiobarbituric acid (TBA) solution and bathed in water for 5 min under 100 °C. After that, it was cooled to room temperature and then centrifuged at 5,000× g at 4 °C for 10 min. Absorbance of samplers was determined at 600, 532, and 450 nm, respectively. The MDA content (μmol·g−1·FW) = [(OD532 − OD600) − 0.56 × OD450] × V/(Vs × m × 100), where, V represented the volume of the extract (mL); Vs indicated the volume of the extract utilized for the measurement (mL); and m represented the weight of the sample (g).

    The total phenolic content of pomegranates was measured as described by Chen et al.[35]. Pomegranate tissues (0.2 g) and 70% methanol (4 mL) were ground into a homogenate in a mortar and then bathed at 70 °C for 15 min. Then, the homogenate were centrifuged at 5,000× g for 20 min after cooled to room temperature. The supernatant was added up to 25 mL using distilled water. After that, the above supernatant (1 mL) was taken and blended with Folin-Ciocalteus (1 mL) and 7.5% sodium carbonate solution (1 mL). After the blend was incubated at 25 °C for 1 h, the phenolic content was determined at an absorbance of 760 nm and denoted as mg·g−1.

    The peroxidase (POD) activity and polyphenol oxidases (PPO) activity were measured according to the method of Si et al.[34]. The pomegranate peel (3 g) and 10 mL PBS solution (1 mM PEG 6000, 4% PVPP, 1% Triton X-100) were taken into pre-cooled mortar and ground into homogenate under the condition of ice bath. Afterward, the mixture was centrifuged at 5,000× g at 4 °C for 30 min. The supernatant was collected as enzyme extracts and stored at 4 °C for later tests. As for POD activity, 0.5 mL enzyme extracts were mixed with 1.0 mL of 5 mM guaiacol solution and 0.5 mL 2% H2O2. At 15 s of the reaction, the absorbance was measured at 470 nm six times (once per 10 s). POD activity (U·g−1·FW) = ΔA470 × Vt/0.01 × m × Vs × t, here in, ΔA470 represented value change in absorbance, t denoted the reaction time, m signified the mass of the sample, Vt indicated the total volume of supernatant, and Vs stood for the volume of supernatant utilized for the measurement. As for PPO activity, 0.1 mL enzyme extracts were blended with 2.9 mL phosphate buffer (pH 5.5) and 1mL of 1 mM catechol solution, and then the mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 10 min. At 15 s of the reaction, the absorbance was read at 420 nm for 6 min (once per 10 s). PPO activity (U·g−1·FW) = ΔA420 × d/0.01 × t, where, ΔA420 represented the value change in absorbance, t denoted the reaction time, and d signified the dilution multiple. In the control group, 0.5 mL distilled water was added to replace the enzyme extracts.

    As claimed by Wei et al.[36], SSC was determined through one pocket refractometer (PAL-3, Japan). TA was evaluated in accordance with the approach of Moon et al.[37].

    Sensory evaluation was conducted in line with the approach of Li et al.[38] with minor adjustments. Pomegranates were eliminated from low-temperature storage after 130 d and stored at ambient conditions (25 °C). The 20 panelists were invited to evaluate the pomegranate samples that were stored at 25 °C on day 1, day 4, day 7, and day 10. The evaluation panelists (10 males and 10 females) were members of the Agricultural Products Logistics Preservation Laboratory. They were between the ages of 20 and 30, and had extensive experience in food sensory evaluation. The members have all received systematic training in the specialized course of food sensory evaluation. Meanwhile, the processing methods of the samples were confidential, and the samples were randomly numbered for sensory evaluation. The sensory evaluated attributes of pomegranates included color, flavor, firmness, texture, and overall acceptability. The preference scale is as follows: very low intensity (scores ≤ 3); low intensity (3 < scores ≤ 5); moderate intensity (5 < scores ≤ 7); elevated intensity (7 < scores ≤ 9); excessively elevated intensity (9 < scores ≤ 10).

    Both technical replications (repeated measurements of the same sample) and biological replications (different samples from the same treatment group) experiments were conducted in triplicate for analysis of each treatment. The SPSS 27 (SPSS Inc., USA) was used to analyze the significance of differences. Moreover, mean values with standard errors were represented. Further, digraph analysis was implemented through Origin 2021 (Microcal Software, MA, USA). Duncan's multiple range tests were applied for analysis of variance (ANOVA). In addition, p < 0.05 is significant.

    The appearance of pomegranates was diverse after 130 days cold storage. Apparent CI symptoms of pomegranates at 0 °C were observed as follows: depression, browning of the husk, pitting, and scald (Fig. 1a). As depicted in Fig. 1b, the CI gradually rose as storage temperature decreased and storage time extended. The results demonstrated that the CI index exhibited a distinctly elevated trend among the pomegranate samples stored at 0 and 1 °C, as compared to the other treatment groups. On day 130, the values reached 0.523 and 0.278, respectively. Similar results have been published by Zhang et al.[23]. The pomegranates stored at 2 °C resulted in a 30 d postponement of the CI occurrence, accompanied by a markedly reduced CI indicator on day 130 in comparison to the group stored at 0 °C. Similar publications have been released in persimmon, where the alleviation of CI was achieved at 4 °C but aggravated at lower storage temperatures[26].

    Figure 1.  Effects of storage temperatures on (a) appearance, (b) CI, (c) decay incidence, along with (d) BI. Values of the figures were exhibited as means ± standard error (n = 3). Vertical bars denoted the standard errors of the means. Disparate small letters denoted significant differences in the treatments for each sampling period at p ≤ 0.05.

    The surface decay on the pomegranate was another pervasive CI symptom[39]. The variation of decay incidence is shown in Fig. 1c. Similar to the trend of the BI index, significantly lower decay incidence was noted from 90 to 130 d for pomegranates stored at 2 °C as compared with other groups. On day 130, the pomegranates stored at 0 °C exhibited a decay incidence of 10.09%, while those stored at 2 °C had the lowest decay incidence at 7.65%. In CI fruit, the amino acids, sugars, and some minerals were released from chilling-injured cells, which could offer the substrate to microorganisms, particularly fungi. The pathogens then infected the fruit and led to decay[27].

    Colouration parameters L*, a*, b*, and ∆E* for pomegranates during storage as displayed in Fig. 2. The L* values of the fruit peel exhibited a decline as the storage time increased. The L* value of pomegranates stored at 0 °C showed a dramatic decline of 37.50% on day 130, while those stored at 4 °C showed a reduction of 26.49% (Fig. 2a). The results suggested that the storage of pomegranates at 0 and 4 °C resulted in the CI and browning, respectively, which in turn led to a reduction in fruit surface luster. The occurrence of CI and browning both led to the decrease of gloss of the pomegranate surface[40], which may be the reason for the higher L* value of samples stored at 2 °C than those stored at other temperatures. Furthermore, there was a similar study in which the decreasing L* values of water core 'Fuji' apples indicated increasing browning[38].

    Figure 2.  Effects of storage temperatures on the (a) L* value, (b) a* value, (c) b* value, and (d) ∆E* value of pomegranates appearance. Values of the figures were displayed as means ± standard error (n = 3). Vertical bars denoted the standard errors of the means. Disparate letters denoted prominent differences in the treatments for each sampling period at p ≤ 0.05.

    The a* values raised constantly in all treatments during the initial 20 d, followed by a gradual decline (Fig. 2b). The a* values of pomegranates stored at 2 °C exhibited a higher level during 130 d of storage than those of other treatments. The a* values of pomegranates stored at 2 °C exhibited the greatest increase, while those stored at 0 °C had the smallest increase during the initial 20 d. It might be that chilling temperature could significantly inhibit the ripening of fresh fruits[20]. Failure to maturity was another ordinary CI symptom among fruits like bananas, tomatoes, and melons[41]. Besides, the a* values of pomegranate samples stored at 3 and 4 °C were found to be lower than those at 2 °C, suggesting that higher storage temperature (3 and 4 °C) may contributed to a higher degree of browning. This was consistent with the results of BI.

    Moreover, the b* values (Fig. 2c) and ∆E* (Fig. 2d) values showed an increasing trend with time. The b* and ∆E* values of pomegranate stored at 0 °C increased the most, while those stored at 2 °C was the least. These changes might correlate to maturity and browning[42]. The results demonstrated that the optimal storage temperature (2 °C) was beneficial to maintain the appearance of pomegranate and delay the browning and senescence.

    SEM observations showed varying degrees of cracking on the surface of the peel at different temperatures (Fig. 3a). By comparison, pomegranates stored at 0 °C exhibited considerable cracks, a rough surface, and severely damaged wax layer. Crack extension might result in further water loss and microbial aggression, which might accelerate fruit decay[43]. Pomegranates stored at 2 °C exhibited no epidermal cracks and retained a complete waxy layer compared to other treatments. Generally, the significant decrease in waxy cuticle thickness might result from the wax falling off the peel surface during fruit storage[43]. The waxy cuticle is a momentous barrier for fruits, which contributes to anti-mechanical damage, resistance to moisture loss, and pathogen penetration[44].

    Figure 3.  Effects of storage temperatures on micro-structure ((a) SEM images, (b) paraffin section images), (c) cell membrane permeability, (d) respiratory rate, and (e) weight loss. Values in the figures were exhibited as means ± standard error (n = 3). Vertical bars stood for the standard errors of the means. Disparate letters denoted prominent differences in treatments for per sampling period at p ≤ 0.05.

    It was noteworthy that cells with CI typically exhibited an irregular and collapsed shape, as illustrated in Fig. 3b. The vascular bundle cells of pomegranates stored at 0 °C were damaged, and the surrounding stone cells were irregularly arranged. Besides, no apparent boundaries emerged between epidermal cells (Fig. 3b.b-1), suggesting that the cell membranes were degraded[17]. Similar findings were observed in CI samples of zucchini, which could be ascribed to dissolution and degradation of cell walls[45]. During 130 d of storage at 2 °C, the majority of cells retained their integrity and original shape (Fig. 3b.b-3).

    The changing patterns of cell membrane permeability are represented in Fig. 3c. Similar to the trends of CI, the cell membrane permeability of pomegranates stored at 0 °C exhibited a notable increase in comparison to the other treatments, particularly within the final 30 d. Notably, cell membrane permeability of pomegranates stored at 0 °C exhibited the greatest increase, reaching 57.46%, while those stored at 2 °C displayed the smallest increase, reaching only 33.68% on day 130. Reportedly, cell membrane lipids experienced a physical variation from a liquid-crystalline to a solid gel state at chilling temperature, resulting in an elevation of membrane permeability and ions leakage[46].

    Respiration, as a basic metabolic activity, was a crucial factor in maintaining the fruit quality[15]. The respiratory rate was presented in Fig. 3c. On day 40, the respiratory rate of pomegranates stored at 0 °C increased significantly and reached a respiratory peak of 34.85 mg∙kg−1∙h−1, which was roughly 1.17 times as high as that of the samples on day 20. Subsequently, respiratory rate slowly declined over times, yet remained higher than other groups. The respiratory rate of fruit stored at 2 °C was decreased steadily and was always lower than other groups throughout the storage time. Thereby, it was indicated that the CI occurrence might trigger a prominent burst in respiratory rate by combining the CI index. CI induced the abrasion of cell membrane and other cell organelles, especially the mitochondrial membrane, resulting in abnormally high respiration rate[46]. The aforementioned findings consisted with previous reports on cucumber and persimmon[46].

    Weight loss is chiefly attributed to the water evaporation from stored pomegranates[46]. Weight loss of pomegranates significantly increased during 130 d of storage (Fig. 3d). On day 130, the pomegranates stored at 4 °C demonstrated the highest weight loss at 6.05%. Following that, the fruit stored at 0 °C exhibited a weight loss of 5.48%. In contrast, the pomegranates stored at 2 °C exhibited the lowest weight loss, at approximately 3.46%. A robust relationship between weight loss and pomegranates respiration rate has been established and the natural barrier of the waxy layer in reducing the fruit weight loss has also been confirmed by Ali et al.[47]. Therefore, less weight loss of pomegranates at 2 °C might be ascribed to stable respiratory rate and slight CI. Pomegranates stored at 0 °C exhibited an abnormal respiratory rate and a destructed waxy layer of peel, which might lead to excessive water loss[48].

    MDA and cell membrane permeability are important indicators of fruit senescence and chilling injury caused by low temperatures[17]. The MDA content raised continuously during the storage of 130 d, as depicted in Fig. 4a. On day 20, the MDA content of pomegranates stored at 0 °C rose to 6.56 μmol·g−1·FW, exhibiting a rise of 3.08 μmol·g−1·FW compared to the initial value, while the samples stored at 2 °C increased by only 1.29 μmol·g−1·FW. The increased MDA content indicated that mild chilling injury had occurred in the pomegranates under the storage condition of 0 °C. It was also reported that both loquat and banana fruits with chilling injury exhibited higher levels of MDA accumulation and electrolyte leakage[49]. The MDA content of pomegranates stored at 2 °C was relatively lower compared to other groups on day 130, reaching only 13.23 μmol·g−1·FW. Notably, the MDA content of pomegranates stored at 0 °C was almost twice as much as that stored at 2 °C on day 130. Accordingly, it was indicated that the formation of MDA in the 'Mengzi' pomegranate was aggravated by the cold stress. The present findings are in agreement with reports on bell peppers and peaches[12].

    Figure 4.  Effects of storage temperatures on (a) MDA, (b) total phenolic content, (c) POD, and (d) PPO. Values of the figures were displayed as means ± standard error (n = 3). Vertical bars denoted the standard errors of the means. Disparate letters represented remarkable differences in the treatments for each sampling period at p ≤ 0.05.

    All treatments exhibited a declined tendency in the total phenolic content during a storage of 130 d (Fig. 4b). The total phenolic content of pomegranates stored at 2 °C declined slower than others, accumulating 35.56 mg·g−1·FW on day 130. In particular, the total phenolic content of pomegranates stored at 0 °C declined dramatically, decreasing by 38.53% on day 130. The total phenolic content of pomegranates stored at 3 and 4 °C were also lower than those stored at 2 °C, which may be due to the increased tissue aging and browning (Fig. 1d) of pomegranates with increasing storage temperature[50]. These results suggested that storage temperature (2 °C) improved the retention of phenolic content in pomegranates. In turn, the high phenolic content increased the resistance to senescence and CI during the post-harvest storage in pomegranates. This may be because the total phenolics can prevent the membrane lipid peroxidation by inhibiting the occurrence and propagation of oxidative chain reactions[12].

    The pattern of POD activity is presented in Fig. 4c. The POD activity of pomegranates stored at 0 °C increased significantly, peaking at 6.44 U·g−1·FW on day 40, and then decreased steadily until day 130. The POD activity of pomegranates stored at 2 °C, by contrast, increased steadily and changed minimally during the storage of 130 d. The changes might be attributed to the accumulated toxic substances (free radicals and MDA) binding to proteins such as defense-related enzymes, destroying structure and function[51]. Consistently, the PPO activity of pomegranates in these groups showed a similar rising tendency with POD activity during storage of 130 d (Fig. 4d). The PPO activity of pomegranates at 0 °C increased to a maximum peak (24.45 U·g−1·FW) on day 70, while other groups peaked on day 100. Notably, the changes in PPO activity of samples stored at 2 °C was always the smallest compared to other groups. Our results corresponded to the former report on phenolase metabolism of Chinese olives under CI storage temperature[11].

    POD and PPO, two key defense-related enzymes, were highly associated with alleviating enzymatic browning. They were also considered as important factors causing browning in post-harvest agricultural products[52]. It was considered that PPO and POD exerted an antagonistic influence over phenolic anabolism in the case of CI. The phenols were oxidized to the quinones by the action of two enzymes (PPO and POD), resulting in typical CI in peaches[51].

    The differences in TA, SSC, and SSC/TA of pomegranates during the storage of 130 d are shown in Table 1. Compared to the initial value, all values of pomegranates declined to varying degrees. Specifically, the SSC content of pomegranates stored at 0 °C was 12.50%, while those stored at 2 °C was 14.34% on day 130. A few soluble sugars could be adopted as signal molecules, adjusting progression and growth, which were strongly associated with maturity and senescence of horticultural products[53]. The possible reason is that the storage temperature of 2 °C could reduce the metabolic intensity and the consumption of the organic matrix, while the reduced SSC in CI pomegranates was possibly attributed to sugars as an energetic response to cold stress[50]. Pomegranates stored at 2 °C exhibited remarkably higher TA values than those at 0 °C. The higher TA loss in pomegranates could be related to increased respiration intensity, in which the organic acid was severely depleted during the high respiration[41]. The solid-acid ratio increased on day 130, however, there were no significant differences among treatments.

    Table 1.  Effects of storage temperatures on soluble solids content (SSC), titratable acids (TA), and SSC/TA of pomegranates.
    Parameter Time (d) Storage temperature
    0 °C 1 °C 2 °C 3 °C 4 °C
    SSC content (%) 0 16.80 ± 0.32
    20 17.31 ± 0.48a 17.43 ± 0.40a 17.97 ± 0.40a 17.65 ± 0.47a 17.01 ± 0.54a
    40 17.54 ± 0.70ab 17.74 ± 0.27ab 18.32 ± 0.31b 17.89 ± 0.44ab 17.34 ± 0.31a
    70 16.01 ± 0.30c 16.31 ± 0.50bc 17.21 ± 0.49a 17.11 ± 0.40ab 15.67 ± 0.56c
    100 14.89 ± 0.40c 15.26 ± 0.40bc 16.46 ± 0.50a 15.66 ± 0.30b 13.57 ± 0.40d
    130 12.50 ± 0.36c 12.75 ± 0.26c 14.34 ± 0.29a 13.40 ± 0.33b 11.83 ± 0.41d
    TA content (%) 0 2.01 ± 0.23
    20 1.66 ± 0.05b 1.75 ± 0.12ab 1.97 ± 0.28a 1.85 ± 0.04ab 1.83 ± 0.04ab
    40 1.54 ± 0.15b 1.64 ± 0.08b 1.93 ± 0.06a 1.71 ± 0.15b 1.67 ± 0.07b
    70 1.43 ± 0.07c 1.55 ± 0.06bc 1.87 ± 0.09a 1.62 ± 0.11b 1.57 ± 0.09b
    100 1.26 ± 0.07d 1.38 ± 0.06c 1.71 ± 0.04a 1.51 ± 0.08b 1.48 ± 0.05bc
    130 1.16 ± 0.04c 1.24 ± 0.05c 1.57 ± 0.07a 1.45 ± 0.05ab 1.39 ± 0.04b
    SSC/TA ratio (%) 0 8.46 ± 1.32
    20 10.44 ± 0.60a 10.02 ± 0.89a 9.28 ± 1.52a 9.55 ± 0.46a 9.30 ± 0.50a
    40 11.43 ± 0.66a 10.86 ± 0.67ab 9.49 ± 0.14ab 10.55 ± 1.16ab 10.39 ± 0.25b
    70 11.23 ± 0.30a 10.55 ± 0.16ab 9.19 ± 0.16c 10.60 ± 0.44ab 9.99 ± 0.90bc
    100 11.85 ± 0.98a 11.06 ± 0.19ab 9.61 ± 0.10cd 10.37 ± 0.71bc 9.17 ± 0.04d
    130 10.81 ± 0.05a 10.32 ± 0.53a 9.13 ± 0.54b 9.25 ± 0.11b 8.54 ± 0.51b
    The results denoted mean ± standard deviations, n = 3. Different letters denoted prominent differences in the treatments for each sampling period at p ≤ 0.05.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The sensory evaluation is presented in Fig. 5. Results demonstrated that pomegranates stored at 2 °C exhibited the highest scores, which were higher than those stored at 0 °C during room temperature storage. Loss of flavor and softening were typically macroscopic CI symptoms, which were usually not easily detected until the fruits were subsequently transferred from cold storage to ambient temperatures[17]. A similar result was found in tomatoes, and the potential mechanisms leading to the specific CI phenomenon were also elucidated. To be specific, the water was absorbed by the middle lamellar when its movement from the symplast to the apoplast occurred, which subsequently reduced the cell turgor pressure and exacerbated the softening induced by CI[23].

    Figure 5.  Pomegranates were stored at low temperatures for 130 d and further stored at 25 °C for 10 d. The pomegranates sensory scores were performed on (a) day 1, (b) day 4, (c) day 7, and (d) day 10 when stored at 25 °C.

    The associations among different quality attributes for pomegranates (Fig. 6) were evaluated using Pearson's correlation analysis. It was found that the rising CI index was positively correlated with BI, b* value, ∆E* value, decay incidence, cell membrane permeability, MDA, POD, PPO, and weight loss, while negatively related to L* value, a* value, SSC, and TA, respiratory rate, and total phenolic content.

    Figure 6.  Pearson's correlation coefficients on the quality attributes of pomegranates stored at 2 °C. The red dots stood for positive correlation; and the blue dots stood for negative correlation. The mark * on dots represented a significant correlation at the level of p ≤ 0.05.

    Consequently, our study corroborated that CI symptoms first appeared around the vascular bundle cells and epidermic cells. The cell membranes were degraded due to the cold stress, and then the total phenolics were oxidized to the quinones by the action of PPO and POD, leading to browning and aging[41]. For another, cell membranes and mitochondrial membranes were degraded, which resulted in the leakage of metabolites and salt ions. Thus, these metabolic disorder induced by the accumulation of toxic substances like ROS and MDA, which accelerated the senescence of fruit and the infection of pathogenic bacteria (Fig. 7)[23].

    Figure 7.  The possible mechanism of precise storage temperature (2 °C) alleviated CI occurrence in 'Mengzi' pomegranate fruit through moderating the antioxidant-oxidant balance and respiration metabolism, which contributed to maintaining membrane integrity and pomegranate quality.

    In this study, the optimal temperature for the long-term cold storage of the 'Mengzi' pomegranates was determined to be 2 °C among the range of 0 to 4 °C. This temperature storage maintained the best appearance quality, with minimal color change and browning index. Not only was the CI index minimized, but the decay rate was also the lowest after 130 d of storage. Meanwhile, the respiratory rate of pomegranates was suppressed, along with a reduction in weight loss when stored at 2 °C. Additionally, the levels of oxidants, including PPO, POD, and MDA, were reduced, while the levels of antioxidants (the total phenolics) were increased. SEM observation and membrane permeability examination revealed the cell integrity of pomegranates stored at 2 °C were the highest. Furthermore, pomegranates stored at 2 °C produced a relatively higher content of soluble solids and titratable acid, as well as better sensory scores. Overall, the results indicated that storage at 2 °C had a significant effect on moderating the antioxidant-oxidant balance and respiration metabolism, contributing to the maintenance of cell integrity and thus alleviating chilling injury. This report may provide the guiding significance for long-term storage of 'Mengzi' pomegranates under precise temperature.

  • The authors contributed the article as below: Li L: compiling the first draft & software. Luo J: validation. Li X: resources & methodology. Pang L: editing. Jia X: visualization. Liu L: software & editing. Kačániováe M: review. Song J: Supervision. Qiao L: editing & review. All authors checked the results and approved the final version.

  • All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

  • This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (3200161737), Science and Technology Action Project of Rural Revitalization Industry Development of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (2022NC119), Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China (2022M712375), and Open Project Program of State Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety (SKLFNS-KF-202316).

  • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

  • [1]

    Yeretzian C. 2017. Coffee. In Springer Handbook of Odor, ed. Buettner A. Cham: Springer. pp. 21−22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26932-0_6

    [2]

    United States Department of Agriculture – Foreign Agricultural Services. 2022. Coffee: World Markets and Trade. https://downloads.usda.library.cornell.edu/usda-esmis/files/m900nt40f/9c67xz908/kp78ht90h/coffee.pdf

    [3]

    Department of Agriculture - High Value Crops Development Program. 2022. Philippine Coffee Industry Roadmap 2021−2025. Department of Agriculture - Bureau of Agricultural Research through UPLB Foundation, Inc. in collaboration with the Philippine Council for Agriculture and Fisheries. 150 pp. www.pcaf.da.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Philippine-Coffee-Industry-Roadmap-2021-2025.pdf

    [4]

    Martinez SJ, Bressani APP, Dias DR, Simão JBP, Schwan RF. 2019. Effect of bacterial and yeast starters on the formation of volatile and organic acid compounds in coffee beans and selection of flavors markers precursors during wet fermentation. Frontiers in Microbiology 10:1287

    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01287

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Haile M, Kang WH. 2019.The harvest and post-harvest management practices’ impact on coffee quality. In Coffee: Production and Research, ed. Castanheira DT. IntechOpen. pp. 59−76. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89224

    [6]

    Vinícius de Melo Pereira G, Soccol VT, Brar SK, Neto E, Soccol CR. 2017. Microbial ecology and starter culture technology in coffee processing. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 57(13):2775−88

    doi: 10.1080/10408398.2015.1067759

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Haile M, Kang WH. 2019. The role of microbes in coffee fermentation and their impact on coffee quality. Journal of Food Quality 2019:4836709

    doi: 10.1155/2019/4836709

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Ribeiro LS, da Cruz Pedrozo Miguel MG, Martinez SJ, Bressani APP, Evangelista SR, et al. 2020. The use of mesophilic and lactic acid bacteria strains as starter cultures for improvement of coffee beans wet fermentation. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 36:186

    doi: 10.1007/s11274-020-02963-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Oumer OJ, Abate D. 2018. Screening and molecular identification of pectinase producing microbes from coffee pulp. BioMed Research International 2018:2961767

    doi: 10.1155/2018/2961767

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Reiner K. 2012. Carbohydrate fermentation protocol. Energy 11:12

    Google Scholar

    [11]

    Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, et al. 2011. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular biology and evolution 28(10):2731−39

    doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Senthilraj R, Prasad GS, Janakiraman K. 2016. Sequence-based identification of microbial contaminants in non-parenteral products. Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 52:329−36

    doi: 10.1590/S1984-82502016000200011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Behera SS, Ray RC, Das U, Panda SK, Saranraj P. 2019. Microorganisms in fermentation. In Essentials in Fermentation Technology. Learning Materials in Biosciences, ed. Berenjian A. Cham: Springer. pp. 1−39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16230-6_1

    [14]

    Pregolini VB, de Melo Pereira GV, da Silva Vale A, de Carvalho Neto DP, Soccol CR. 2021. Influence of environmental microbiota on the activity and metabolism of starter cultures used in coffee beans fermentation. Fermentation 7(4):278

    doi: 10.3390/fermentation7040278

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Zhang SJ, De Bruyn F, Pothakos V, Torres J, Falconi C, et al. 2019. Following coffee production from cherries to cup: Microbiological and metabolomic analysis of wet processing of Coffea arabica. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 85(6):e02635−18

    doi: 10.1128/AEM.02635-18

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Elhalis H, Cox J, Frank D, Zhao J. 2021. Microbiological and chemical characteristics of wet coffee fermentation inoculated with Hansinaspora uvarum and Pichia kudriavzevii and their impact on coffee sensory quality. Frontiers in Microbiology 12:713969

    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.713969

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Haile S, Masi C, Tafesse M. 2022. Isolation and characterization of pectinase-producing bacteria (Serratia marcescens) from avocado peel waste for juice clarification. BMC Microbiology 22(1):145

    doi: 10.1186/s12866-022-02536-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Gopinath SCB, Anbu P, Arshad MKM, Lakshmipriya T, Voon CH, et al. 2017. Biotechnological processes in microbial amylase production. BioMed Research International 2017:1272193

    doi: 10.1155/2017/1272193

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Jayasekara S, Ratnayake R. 2019. Microbial cellulases: an overview and applications. In Cellulose, eds. Pascual AR, Martin ME. IntechOpen. 22:92. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.84531

    [20]

    Pant G, Prakash A, Pavani JVP, Bera S, Deviram GVNS, et al. 2015. Production, optimization and partial purification of protease from Bacillus subtilis. Journal of Taibah University for Science 9(1):50−55

    doi: 10.1016/j.jtusci.2014.04.010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Peñuela-Martínez AE, Zapata-Zapata AD, Durango-Restrepo DL. 2018. Performance of different fermentation methods and the effect on coffee quality (Coffea arabica L.). Coffee Science 13:465−76

    doi: 10.25186/cs.v13i4.1486

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Pérez-Díaz IM, Altuntas EG, Juneja VK. 2017. Microbial Fermentation in Food Preservation. In Microbial Control and Food Preservation. Food Microbiology and Food Safety, eds. Juneja V, Dwivedi H, Sofos J. New York: Springer. pp. 281−98. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7556-3_13

    [23]

    Guan N, Liu L. 2020. Microbial response to acid stress: mechanisms and applications. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 104:51−65

    doi: 10.1007/s00253-019-10226-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Clarridge JE 3rd. 2004. Impact of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis for identification of bacteria on clinical microbiology and infectious diseases. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 17(4):840−62

    doi: 10.1128/CMR.17.4.840-862.2004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Kim M, Chun J. 2014. 16S rRNA gene-based identification of bacteria and archaea using the EzTaxon server. In Methods in microbiology. New Approaches to Prokaryotic Systematics, eds. Goodfellow M, Sutcliffe I, Chun J. vol. 41. UK: Academic Press. pp. 61−74. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.mim.2014.08.001

    [26]

    Avallone S, Guyot B, Brillouet JM, Olguin E, Guiraud JP. 2001. Microbiological and biochemical study of coffee fermentation. Current Microbiology 42:252−56

    doi: 10.1007/s002840110213

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Duong B, Marraccini P, Maeght JL, Vaast P, Lebrun M, Duponnois R. 2020. Coffee microbiota and its potential use in sustainable crop management. A review. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 4:607935

    doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2020.607935

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Reddy MPC, Saritha KV. 2016. Effects of the culture media optimization on pectinase production by Enterobacter sp. PSTB-1. 3 Biotech 6:207

    doi: 10.1007/s13205-016-0502-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Roy K, Dey S, Uddin MK, Barua R, Hossain MT. 2018. Extracellular pectinase from a novel bacterium Chryseobacterium indologenes strain SD and its application in fruit juice clarification. Enzyme Research 2018:3859752

    doi: 10.1155/2018/3859752

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Elhalis H, Cox J, Zhao J. 2023. Coffee fermentation: Expedition from traditional to controlled process and perspectives for industrialization. Applied Food Research 3(1):100253

    doi: 10.1016/j.afres.2022.100253

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    de Oliveira Junqueira AC, de Melo Pereira GV, Coral Medina JD, Alvear MCR, Rosero R, et al. 2019. First description of bacterial and fungal communities in Colombian coffee beans fermentation analysed using Illumina-based amplicon sequencing. Scientific Reports 9:8794

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45002-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Cortes AD, Baldomero JRN, Baltazar MD. 2024. Molecular identification of indigenous pectinolytic bacteria characterized for starter culture in coffee fermentation. Beverage Plant Research 4: e026 doi: 10.48130/bpr-0024-0015
    Cortes AD, Baldomero JRN, Baltazar MD. 2024. Molecular identification of indigenous pectinolytic bacteria characterized for starter culture in coffee fermentation. Beverage Plant Research 4: e026 doi: 10.48130/bpr-0024-0015

Figures(1)  /  Tables(4)

Article Metrics

Article views(2684) PDF downloads(683)

ARTICLE   Open Access    

Molecular identification of indigenous pectinolytic bacteria characterized for starter culture in coffee fermentation

Beverage Plant Research  4 Article number: e026  (2024)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: From cherries to green beans, coffee undergoes a post-harvest fermentation process. The quality of coffee is influenced by the origin and microbiological activities that drive coffee fermentation, particularly pectin hydrolysis. Coffee-associated pectinolytic microorganisms have been isolated and characterized to explore their potential as starter cultures for coffee fermentation. This study characterizes the indigenous pectinolytic bacteria for starter cultures, which were isolated during the wet fermentation of Coffea arabica cherries. A total of five indigenous bacteria had the ability to produce pectinase enzymes with solubilization index ranging 3.75−5.33 and enzymatic activity ranging 1.22−1.268 μmol min−1. Interestingly, these bacteria showed amylase, cellulase, and protease activity in addition to pectinase. All of them are capable of fermenting multiple sugars and releasing acids. Moreover, they tolerate a wide range of fermentation stress (i.e., temperature, pH, salt, and alcohol). Based on the 16S rRNA gene sequencing, they were designated as Chryseobacterium bernardetii (P5B3.4 and P3TA.1), Chryseobacterium indologenes (P5TC.3), Enterobacter hormaechei (P5TA.4), and Klebsiella variicola (P3TD.5). The genera of these pectinolytic bacterial species are part of coffee microbiota and found to be associated with coffee cherries. Thus, they pose potential use for starter culture in coffee fermentation in the Philippines.

    • Coffee is one of the viable agricultural commodities making an economic and social impact worldwide. Many coffee-producing countries in the coffee belt are benefiting from this crop because it represents a major source of income[1]. The global consumption of coffee is expected to rise from 800,000 - 60 kg bag to 167.9 million - 60 kg bag, by which the European Union, USA and Brazil have the largest gains[2]. The Philippines is only 15% self-sufficient in coffee despite having the ideal conditions to grow quality coffee varieties[3]. Recently, the demand for quality coffee has increased because of the available specialty coffees in the market[4]. The coffee quality is majorly associated with post-harvest management operations that determine the cupping quality profiles, this includes the wet processing method[5].

      Fermentation is a crucial step in wet processing and it is commonly driven by microorganisms that can play a number of roles, such as degradation of mucilage from the coffee parchment, inhibition of mycotoxin-producing fungi, and production of flavor-active compounds[6]. The coffee mucilage has sticky pectin polysaccharide substances that are laborious to eliminate using water. Natural plant enzymes may facilitate the degradation of mucilage, however it is not a sufficient process. The participation of microorganisms like pectinolytic bacteria can lead to the complete degradation of pectinaceous substances, accelerating the production of green coffee beans[7]. The different metabolites and organic acids produced by pectinolytic bacteria are stored in the coffee beans and may affect the coffee quality[5]. Thus, the role of microbes to control fermentation and promote specialty coffee has been extensively studied by utilizing them as starter cultures[7].

      Starter culture application aims to accelerate the fermentation of coffee mucilage using microbes like yeast and bacteria[6]. These starter cultures can rapidly increase the acidity by reducing the pH and shorten the fermentation time period. Bacterial starters are producers of acid compounds and yeast starters of volatile alcohols[4]. As a result, they can produce coffee with unique aromas and flavors, leading to new perspectives of coffee quality[8].

      In this study, we aimed to characterize and identify indigenous pectinolytic bacteria isolated from wet coffee fermentation for their potential use as starter cultures. The hydrolytic enzyme production of these pectinolytic bacteria were evaluated along with sugar fermentation and tolerance to a wide range of abiotic stresses.

    • A total of 2 kg of cherries from Arabica trees (Typica) were collected from a coffee farm in Itogon, Benguet (1,253.701 masl; Lat. 16.34056465° N and Lon. 120.62705884° E). Ripe cherries were manually picked, washed, and immediately soaked in water to separate the defects (i.e., overripe, undeveloped, and infected coffee cherries). After 12 h, sinkers were manually depulped and the parchment coffee with mucilage was subjected to 48-h fermentation in a controlled environment. The pH and temperature of the fermentation setup were monitored every 12-h interval sampling period.

    • During fermentation, the colony forming units (CFU) mL−1 of the total aerobic bacteria were enumerated, following the serial dilution and spread-plate method. A total of 10 mL liquid fraction from 12-h interval time points (i.e., 0, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h) during wet fermentation were collected and diluted in 90 mL sterile saline solution (0.85% NaCl [w/v]). The mixture was serially diluted 10-fold up to 10−5 dilution and immediately plated on the plate count agar (PCA) medium in triplicates. Agar plates were incubated at room temperature for 24 h and the CFU mL−1 was calculated.

      A total of 35 bacterial colonies were randomly picked based on their unique colony morphologies and were subjected to purification through successive streaking on PCA medium. The purity of the cultures was confirmed through Gram staining and pure cultures were stored at 4 °C until further use.

    • The bacterial isolates were screened for their ability to produce pectinase using a pectin agar medium, containing 0.5 g·L−1 peptone, 0.3 g·L−1 beef extract, 0.5 g·L−1 NaCl, 4 g·L−1 citrus pectin, and 12 g·L−1 agar. Initial number of cells were adjusted to 0.5 McFarland standard that is approximately 1.5 × 108 CFU mL−1, this was used in all experimental plate assays. Briefly, a total of 4 μl of 24-h broth culture inoculum was spot inoculated in triplicate on the citrus pectin agar medium and plates were incubated at 30 °C for 96 h. Pectinase activity was confirmed based on the appearance of clear zones around colonies after flooding of 300 mM potassium iodide-iodine solution. The pectin solubilization index was calculated by dividing the colony diameter + zone diameter over colony diameter.

    • Pectinolytic bacteria were subjected to pectinase enzyme assay in triplicate using the method of Oumer & Abate[9]. The isolates were grown in citrus pectin broth and the initial number of inoculum was adjusted to 0.5 McFarland standard. A total of 1.5 mL of culture was then centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5 min to extract crude pectinase enzyme. Likewise, the substrate was prepared by adding 0.5% w/v citrus pectin to pH 7.5 0.1 M phosphate buffer. A volume of 100 μL of crude enzyme was added to a test tube containing 900 μL of substrate. Shortly, reagent blank was prepared by adding 100 μL of distilled water to a test tube containing 900 μL of substrate, while a test tube containing only 900 μL of substrate served as the enzyme blank. The test tubes were placed in a water bath at 50 °C for 10 min. Two millimeters of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent (DNS) was then added to the test tubes to terminate the reaction. Meanwhile, 100 μL of crude enzyme was added to the enzyme blank, then all test tubes were again incubated in the water bath at 92 °C for 10 min. Lastly, the tubes were allowed to cool and optical density (OD) at 540 nm was measured using Epoch 2 microplate spectrophotometer (BioTek). Enzyme activity was measured against enzyme blank and reagent blank. The amount of enzyme that catalyzes galacturonic acid at a period of time (μmol·min−1) was determined based on the OD readings.

    • The pectinolytic bacteria isolates were also subjected to other hydrolytic enzyme activities, such as amylase, cellulase, and protease.

      The amylase production of the pectinolytic bacteria was screened using the starch medium, containing 0.5 g·L−1 peptone, 3 g·L−1 beef extract, 0.5 g·L−1 NaCl, 10 g·L−1 soluble starch, and 12 g·L−1 agar. Similarly, 4 μl of 24-h broth culture inoculum was spot-plated in triplicate on the starch agar medium and plates were incubated at 30 °C for 48 h. Agar plates were then flooded with Gram’s iodine solution to observe for clearing around colonies.

      Cellulase activity was screened using the carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) agar medium, containing 0.5 g·L−1 KH2PO4, 0.25 g·L−1 MgSO4, 2 g·L−1 carboxymethyl cellulose, 0.2 g·L−1 Congo red, 2 g·L−1 gelatin, and 12 g·L−1 agar. Agar plates were incubated at 30 °C for 24 h and clear zones around colonies were observed.

      Protease production was evaluated using the non-fat milk agar medium, containing 3 g·L−1 peptone, 1 g·L−1 yeast extract, 100 mL·L−1 UHT non-fat milk, and 12 g·L−1 agar. Spot plating was used by inoculating 4 μl of 24-h inoculum on milk agar medium in triplicate and incubated at 30 °C for 48 h. Clear zones around the colonies indicate a positive protease activity.

    • Pectinolytic bacterial isolates were grown on different carbohydrates (i.e., glucose, fructose, galactose, sorbitol, mannitol, sucrose, lactose, and maltose) to screen their ability to ferment sugars and produce acids. We adopted the standard carbohydrate fermentation protocol of Reiner[10] using phenol red carbohydrate broth, containing 10 g·L−1 peptone, 5 g·L−1 NaCl, 1 g·L−1 beef extract, 0.018 g·L−1 phenol red, and 10 g·L−1 carbohydrate. A color change into yellow indicates fermentation of sugars due to the production of acids in the medium.

    • The bacterial isolates were subjected to abiotic stress tolerance on varying temperatures (4, 22, 45 °C) , pH (4, 7, 9), salt (3%, 7%, 10% NaCl), and alcohol levels (1%, 3%, 5% ethanol) using a nutrient broth substrate. Turbidity indicates bacterial growth and tolerance to specific conditions.

    • The genomic DNA of pectinolytic bacteria were extracted using Vivantis GF-1 Bacterial DNA Extraction Kit, following manufacturer's protocol. The quality of DNA was verified in 0.8% agarose gel dissolved in 0.5X TAE buffer using gel electrophoresis and gel documentation system (Vilber Lourmat). The concentration and purity of DNA were quantified using a NanoDrop 2000c UV-Vis Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific™).

      The extracted genomic DNA was subjected to PCR amplification by targeting the 16S rRNA gene using universal primers 27f (5'-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3') and 1492r (5'-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3'). PCR was performed in a 50-uL reaction containing 1X Taq Master Mix (Vivantis), 2 mM MgCl2, 0.2 μM each of 27f and 1492r primers, and 100 ng of DNA template. A final volume of 50 μL was adjusted with sterile nano pure water. PCR reactions were performed using MiniAmp Plus thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems™) with the following conditions: initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min, with a final extension step of 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR products were verified through gel electrophoresis using 1.2% agarose gel (stained with GelRed®) under 100 V for 35 min and sent for sequencing.

      The 16S rRNA gene sequences obtained were compared with the NCBI database through BLASTn searches. The closely related sequences with ≥ 98% similarity were downloaded as a FASTA file, aligned using Muscle software with default settings, and constructed to a phylogenetic tree by Neighbor-Joining algorithm in MEGA software[11,12]. The identity of the bacteria was verified based on the clustering of the target sequence with the closest annotated sequence in the tree.

    • During fermentation, the pH level decreases as the process progresses. For this 24-h time point fermentation, the lowest pH recorded was 4.024 (Table 1). The temperature remained constant at 26 °C in different time points since the set-up is controlled. For a 48-h fermentation, the maximum rate of total aerobic bacteria (7.05 × 107 CFU ml−1) was found at 24-h. A rapid rise of the bacterial population, from 6.95 × 105 to 3.21 × 107 CFU ml−1, was observed within the first 12 h of the fermentation process (Table 1).

      Table 1.  Changes in pH and culturable population of total aerobic bacteria in 12-h interval time points over 48-h Arabica coffee fermentation.

      Environmental
      factors
      Fermentation time
      0-h12-h24-h36-h48-h
      pH6.5185.0834.0244.6334.451
      Total aerobic
      bacteria
      (CFU ml−1)*
      6.95 × 1053.21 × 1077.05 × 1076.40 × 1073.60 × 107
      * CFU (Colony forming unit) after 24 h incubation.

      A total of 35 bacterial colonies were randomly selected based on their colony morphological differences. The pure cultures exhibited a wide range of colony characteristics, including margin, shape, elevation, and color (data not shown). The pure cultures isolated in the present study are all Gram-negative and rod-shaped bacteria.

    • The study successfully screened five pectinolytic bacteria based on their pectinase activity on the citrus pectin agar medium (Fig. 1a). The pectin solubilization index ranges from 3.75 to 5.33 and the pectinase activity ranges from 1.222 to 1.268 μmol·min−1 by which isolates P5B3.4 and P3TA.1 exhibited the highest enzymatic index and activity (Table 2).

      Figure 1. 

      Enzymatic activities of bacteria from coffee fermentation: (a) pectinase, (b) amylase, (c) protease, and (d) cellulase.

      Table 2.  Pectinase activity of bacterial isolates obtained from Arabica coffee fermentation.

      Isolate Solubilization index* Enzymatic activity (μmol·min−1)*
      P5TC.3 5.16 ± 0.05 1.257 ± 0.038
      P3TD.5 4.13 ± 0.00 1.246 ± 0.019
      P5TA.4 3.75 ± 0.11 1.222 ± 0.012
      P5B3.4 5.33 ± 0.00 1.263 ± 0.018
      P3TA.1 5.33 ± 0.00 1.268 ± 0.010
      * Values are mean ± SD in triplicate.

      In terms of their other hydrolytic enzyme production, all of these pectinolytic bacteria were able to produce amylase, protease, and cellulase (Table 3) based on the solubilization activities (clearing around the colonies) on the starch agar (Fig. 1b), milk agar (Fig. 1c), and CMC Congo red agar (Fig. 1d) plates, respectively.

      Table 3.  Characteristics of pectinolytic bacteria from fermenting arabica beans.

      Characteristic P5TC.3 P5TA.4 P5B3.4 P3TA.1 P3TD.5
      Gram reaction
      Shape Rods Rods Rods Rods Rods
      Hydrolytic enzyme activity
      Pectinase + + + + +
      Cellulase + + + + +
      Amylase + + + + +
      Protease + + + + +
      Fermentation of (acid production from) carbohydrates
      Glucose + + + + +
      Fructose + + + + +
      Galactose + +
      Sorbitol + +
      Mannitol + +
      Sucrose + + + + +
      Maltose + + + + +
      Lactose + +
      Growth at different temperatures
      4 °C +* + + + +*
      22 °C + + + + +
      45 °C + +
      Growth at different pH conditions
      4 + + + + +
      7 + + + + +
      9 + + +
      Growth at different NaCl concentrations
      3% + + + + +
      7% + +
      10% +
      Growth at different alcohol levels
      1% + + + + +
      3% + + + + +
      5%
      Legend: (+) positive; (+*) weak growth; (−) negative
    • Table 3 shows that all of the bacterial isolates are capable of fermenting multiple sugars, especially P5TA.4 and P3TD.5 that ferment all of the eight sugars tested. The rest only ferment glucose, fructose, sucrose and maltose.

    • All pectinolytic bacteria relatively exerted tolerance to different temperatures, pH, salt, and alcohol concentrations. Bacterial isolates grow poorly and slowly at 4 °C, whereas P5TA.4 and P3TD.5 tolerated 45 °C. For acid tolerance, all isolates are capable of thriving in a pH 4 medium and mostly tolerate the pH 9. Among them, isolate P3TD.5 tolerate up to 7% NaCl while P5TA.4 tolerate up to 10% NaCl concentration. Moreover, all isolates are capable of growing up to 3% alcohol (Table 3).

    • Based on the 16S rRNA gene analysis with ≥ 98% similarity, the pectinolytic bacteria are all Gram negative and rod-shaped cells identified as Chryseobacterium bernardetii (98.25%, 98.52%), Chryseobacterium indologenes (99%), Enterobacter hormaechei (99%), and Klebsiella variicola (99%) (Table 4).

      Table 4.  Molecular identities of pectinolytic bacteria obtained from coffee fermentation.

      IsolateClosest neighbor (type strain)SimilarityIdentityAccession no.
      P5TC.3Chryseobacterium indologenes strain WZE8799%Chryseobacterium indologenesHQ848390.1
      P3TD.5Klebsiella variicola strain DX120E99%Klebsiella variicolaCP009274.2
      P5TA.4Enterobacter hormaechei strain RPK299%Enterobacter hormaecheiKX980424.1
      P5B3.4Chryseobacterium bernardetii strain G22998.52%Chryseobacterium bernardetiiJX100816.1
      P3TA.1Chryseobacterium bernardetii strain G22998.25%Chryseobacterium bernardetiiJX100816.1
    • Microorganisms like bacteria play a huge role in fermentation processes[13]. A study suggests that the microbiome profiling in coffee fermentation is dominated by lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and acetic acid bacteria (AAB) after 6 h and the acid tolerant bacteria remains until the end of the process[14]. The organic compounds and acids released by LAB, AAB and other fermenting microbes can accumulate in the fermentation setup, creating a more acidic environment[15]. Our study recorded the lowest pH of 4.024 at 24 h fermentation time where the highest population of aerobic bacteria was also recorded (Table 1). Similarly, it was reported that the population of total aerobic bacteria really increased as the fermentation progressed[15,16]. Meanwhile, the present study isolated rod-shaped and Gram-negative bacteria, which corroborated with the study of Pregolini et al.[14], suggesting that members of Enterobacteriaceae are present in higher frequencies even at the beginning of the fermentation.

      The beans of a coffee cherry are surrounded by different layers, including the sticky polysaccharide layer called pectin[5]. Pectinase production is important to easily digest the sticky pectin substances in the mucilage by breaking the α-1,4-glycosidic bonds in pectin[17]. The production of pectinolytic enzymes and formation of alcohols and acids (butyric acetic, lactic, and other long-chained carboxylic acids) are associated with microbes such as pectinolytic bacteria[5]. Our study successfully screened and identified pectinolytic bacteria obtained during Arabica fermentation, showing their potential in accelerating mucilage degradation. Besides, for complete pectin degradation in coffee mucilage, three enzymes are involved, including polygalacturonase, pectin lyase, and pectin methylesterase[7]. Thus, the pectinolytic trait of certain species of bacteria poses a vital role as potential starter culture for coffee fermentation. On the other hand, other hydrolytic enzymes such as amylase[18], cellulase[19], and protease[20] are commonly produced by a broad range of microorganisms, possessing characteristics of biotechnological interest and industrial applications. In the present study, multiple hydrolytic enzyme production of these pectinolytic bacteria revealed promising potential as starter cultures in coffee fermentation. Also, these bacteria were able to ferment different sugars and produced acids, indicating their ability to perform fermentation (Table 3).

      Coffee from the wet fermentation processing method is more acidic than the others due to lowering of pH by bacteria during wet fermentation[21], thus tolerance to this stress helps starter culture to perform optimum process during fermentation. The tolerance of these pectinolytic bacteria in a wide range of temperature, pH level, high salt and alcohol contents contribute to their roles as potential starter cultures (Table 3). The activity of starter cultures on fermentation impacts bioactivity, stability, antimicrobial activity and toxicity of the finished product[22], especially when exposed to abiotic stresses. The ability of these bacteria to develop resistance or tolerance to multiple stresses can be attributed to their ability to maintain pH homeostasis, cell membrane integrity and fluidity, metabolic regulation, and macromolecule repair[23].

      The prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene (~1,500 bp) is composed of variable regions interspersed between conserved regions[24]. This gene has become the gold standard to identify bacteria and establish taxonomic relationships between prokaryotes, with 98.65% similarity as the threshold for delineating species[25]. Our study has isolated species of Gram-negative, rod-shaped bacteria that were molecular identified as Chryseobacterium bernardetii, Chryseobacterium indologenes, Enterobacter hormaechei, and Klebsiella variicola. The coffee fermentation microflora are rich and mainly constituted of aerobic Gram-negative, rod-shaped bacteria[26]. The genera Chryseobacterium, Enterobacter, and Klebsiella were found to be part of the core coffee microbiota in different plant compartments (i.e., rhizosphere, episphere, and endosphere)[27], and their pectinolytic activities were previously reported[2830]. Moreover, the genera Enterobacter and Klebsiella are prevalent at the beginning of fermentation process[31], but to our knowledge there was no report of Chryseobacterium species in coffee fermentation. Nevertheless, fermentation affects the metabolic activities of these natural microbiota, which predominantly grow and uniquely impact the coffee quality[30].

    • The study isolated indigenous pectinolytic bacteria that show promising potential for starter cultures in coffee fermentation. Aside from pectinase, these bacteria also produce other hydrolytic enzymes (i.e., amylase, protease, and cellulase) and are capable of fermenting different types of sugars. Their tolerance to a wide range of abiotic stresses pose an additional promising role as potential starter cultures. Molecular identification confirmed that they belong to the genera Chryseobacterium, Enterobacter, and Klebsiella, which are found to be part of coffee microbiota. These findings suggest the potential use of pectinolytic bacteria as starter cultures in coffee fermentation.

    • The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Cortes A, Baltazar M; material preparation and data collection: Cortes A, Baldomero JR; analysis and interpretation of results: Cortes A, Baldomero JR; draft manuscript preparation: Cortes A; review and editing: Baltazar M; fund acquisition: Baltazar M, Cortes A. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    • All data generated and analyzed are included in this paper.

      • The study was funded by US Department of Agriculture through ACDI-VOCA under the PhilCAFE In-Kind Grant project (Grant No: 718948656). We are grateful to the Equilibrium Intertrade Corporation for providing Arabica coffee cherry samples and assistance during collection as well as to Mr. Maowel Villanueva for the technical assistance during sample collection and processing.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2024 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (1)  Table (4) References (31)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Cortes AD, Baldomero JRN, Baltazar MD. 2024. Molecular identification of indigenous pectinolytic bacteria characterized for starter culture in coffee fermentation. Beverage Plant Research 4: e026 doi: 10.48130/bpr-0024-0015
    Cortes AD, Baldomero JRN, Baltazar MD. 2024. Molecular identification of indigenous pectinolytic bacteria characterized for starter culture in coffee fermentation. Beverage Plant Research 4: e026 doi: 10.48130/bpr-0024-0015

Catalog

  • About this article

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return