-
The fungus Alternaria is widely distributed and comprises pathogenic, endophytic, and saprobic species that are linked to a broad range of substrates[30]. It is also globally recognized for it's capacity to generate a broad range of secondary metabolites, such as mycotoxins that can contaminate foods and different phytotoxins linked to plant disease, both host- and non-host-specific[31]. This plant pathogen is capable of causing postharvest spoiling of several crops, such as tomatoes, strawberries, apples, melon, pears, and citrus[5], and is reported to infect over 400 host plants[32].
Alternaria alternata is considered one of the most devastating fungi infecting soybean foliar, causing leaf spot and leaf blight diseases[33]. This global fungal genus is also a key player in the grapevine microbiome and has been identified as producing a wide range of secondary metabolites, which are especially important in terms of crop protection and food safety[34]. The fungus A. alternata causes black spot as well as brown spot in citrus mainly through exploiting the surface lesions caused by sunburn, bruising, or fruit cracking[35]. In tomatoes, A. alternata diseases are marked by the appearance of early fruit blight, stem, and canker. In extreme situations, these diseases result in full plant defoliation by reducing the photosynthetic surface of the leaves[36]. Although A. alternata is a necrotrophic pathogen, it can also infect seeds and influence the following generation if the plant sustains significant damage[36]. Furthermore, A. alternata is responsible for latent infections in winter jujubes[37]. Through horizontally transferring a whole pathogenicity chromosome, A. alternata was able to generate the host-specific toxin AAL and infect tomatoes[38]. Plant and animal cells exposed to Alternaria toxins undergo apoptotic morphology as a result of the death process[39]. The toxins produced by A. alternata are responsible for their pathogenicity on tomatoes, inhibiting the sphingolipid biosynthesis in vitro and toxic for certain plant species. A. alternata conidia germinate rapidly in damp environments and start to release toxins before penetrating the tissue[40]. In addition, the toxigenic fungus A. alternata causes brown rot in apples and has been associated with food poisoning since it can produce mycotoxins such as altenuene (ALT), the benzopyrene derivatives alternariol (AOH), the perylene derivative altertoxin (ATX), the tenuazonic acid (TeA), alternariol monomethyl ether (AME), and tentoxin (TEN) during infection[10]. The main Alternaria toxins, including their chemical names, molecular weights, CAS numbers and hazard identifications are compiled in Table 1 as reported in the scientific literature[41,42]. Various techniques have been applied to determine and confirm the identity of Alternaria toxins, including high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC), thin-layer chromatography (TLC), gas chromatography (GC), and more often liquid chromatography (LC), primarily with ultraviolet (UV) detection, atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI), LC-mass spectroscopy (MS), and LC-MS/MS[41]. Although the Alternaria toxins cause serious issues, none of the Alternaria toxins found in food and feed are subject to specific national or international restrictions[43].
Table 1. The chemical name, molecular formula, molecular weight, CAS number, and hazard identification of major Alternaria toxins.
Chemical structure Mycotoxin Chemical name Molecular formula Molecular
weight (g/mol)Chemical abstracts services (CAS) number Hazard identification Dibenzopyrone derivatives Alternariol (AOH) 3,7,9-trihydroxy-1-methyl-6H-dibenzo[b,d]pyran-6-one C14H10O5 258.226 641-38-3 - AOH, AME, and ALT are less poisonous than other mycotoxins
- At doses of ≥ 1 μM and 25 μM, respectively, AOH and AME markedly enhanced the rate of DNA strand breaks in human colon cancer cellsAlternariol monomethyl ether (AME) 3,7-dihydroxy-9-methoxy-1-methyl-6H-dibenzo[b,d]pyran-6-one C15H12O5 272.253 23452-05-3 Altenuene (ALT) 2α,3α,4aβ-tetrahydro-2,3,7-trihydroxy-9-methoxy-4a-methyl-6H-dibenzo[b,d]pyran-6-one C15H16O6 292.284 29752-43-0 Perylene quinone derivatives Altertoxin I (ATX I) 1,2,7,8,12b-pentahydro-1,4,6b,10-tetrahydroxy-perylene-3,9-dione C20H16O6 352.337 56258-32-3 - Compared to AOH and AME, ATX I, -II, and -III are more powerful mutagens and acute poisons for mice
- ATX-II has high genotoxicity and is the most powerful member of the ATX group with various action mechanismsAltertoxin II (ATX II) [perylo(1,2-b)oxirene-7,11-dione,7a,8a,8b,8c,9,10-hexahydro-1,6,8c-trihydroxy-, (7aR,8aR,8bS,8cR)-] C20H14O6 350.321 56257-59-1 Altertoxin III (ATX III) [perylo(1,2-b:7,8-b’)bisoxirene-5,10-dione, 1a,1b,5a,6a,6b,10a-hexahydro-4,9-dihydroxy-] C20H12O6 348.306 105579-74-6 Tetramic acid derivatives Tenuazonic acid (TeA) 3-acetyl-5-sec-butyl-4-hydroxy-3-pyrrolin-2-one C10H15NO3 197.231 610-88-8 - TeA is more poisonous compared to AOH, AME, and ALT
- By preventing the release of freshly synthesized proteins from the ribosomes, TeA suppresses protein production at the ribosomal level in mammalian cells -
The reduction of postharvest losses, as well as the need for sustainable disease control has grown as a result of tighter regulations on chemical fungicides. While fungicides are still the primary means of managing postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables, more studies have been conducted to identify sustainable alternatives due to the negative impacts of fungicides on human health and the environment, as well as the prevalence of pathogen resistance[28]. Sustainable postharvest disease management is provided via biological control, partly due to the emergence of parasitoid and predator resistance. Biological control is the use of natural microorganisms, such as yeast and bacteria, as antagonists in controlling pests, diseases, or weeds through an ecological interaction[53]. This ecosystem service, valued at billions of dollars yearly, has been regarded as a promising alternative because of its cheap cost and long-term effectiveness[54].
Several yeasts have been reported to be successfully applied as BCA against postharvest pathogens[28]. Metschnikowia pulcherrima strain MACH1 effectively inhibited A. alternata and B. cinerea growth in apples via iron depletion[55]. Furthermore, by enhancing the enzymatic system for ROS scavenging in cherry tomatoes, Pichia caribbica was able to greatly reduce the incidence of black spot and sustain the elevated levels of essential antioxidant compounds while simultaneously reducing the generation of O2‾·, H2O2, and malondialdehyde (MDA)[56]. The antagonistic yeast W. anomalus, isolated from the soil in a fruit orchard, significantly controlled postharvest gray mold disease of kiwifruits caused by B. cinerea through preventing fungal pathogen growth in vitro, quickly colonizing kiwifruit wounds and surfaces, adhesion to fungal mycelia's surface, potent biofilm-forming capacity, and production of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) with antifungal properties[57]. Its high-throughput sequencing analysis showed that W. anomalus has a major impact on the fungal community and has a favorable effect on the structure of the kiwifruit epiphytic and endophytic communities[58]. Chitin, extracted from yeast cells, is a successful method for triggering resistance against gray mold decay in tomatoes caused by B. cinerea. Its application also leads to an increase in the accumulation of ROS and deposition of callose[59]. In addition to this evidence, several BCA products such as Candifruit, Aspire, BOTRY-Zen, and BoniProtect have also been developed and commercialized, which thus have the potential to make a significant contribution to the biocontrol of fruit postharvest diseases[60].
Furthermore, to offer a broad range, persistence, and higher levels of yeast concentration against fungal diseases, a variety of natural substances, in conjunction with antagonists, have been recently identified to improve the BCA effects[60]. Several natural compounds and their remarkable effects as enhancers have been applied together with antagonists against postharvest diseases in fruits and vegetables[61]. Generally, these combined treatments serve a sustainable strategy that is highly effective and safe for controlling fruit postharvest diseases, in which disease control at the commercial level (97%–99%) can be achieved through these combined methods[61]. Rhamnolipids, a surfactant produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, was more effective in degrading A. alternata disease in cherry tomatoes when combining with Rhodotorula glutinis compared to their single treatment. Furthermore, the activities of phenylalanine ammonialyase (PAL), polyphenoloxidase (PPO), and peroxidase (POD) in cherry tomatoes were significantly stimulated by the combination treatments, which were higher than those of the single treatments[62]. Similarly, the control effects of Cryptococcus laurentii in suppressing gray and blue mold disease in pears were significantly higher after combining with calcium chloride (CaCl2)[63]. Other substances such as ascorbic acid (AA)[64], chitosan[65], methyl jasmonate (MeJa)[66], phytic acid[67], sodium bicarbonate (SBC)[68], and sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC-Na)[69] have also been successfully applied as enhancer to boost the effectiveness of antagonistic yeasts against fungal pathogens (Table 2).
Table 2. Various combination treatments that have been successfully applied in fruit postharvest disease control.
Treatment Target pathogens Target crops Ref. Ascorbic acid + Pichia caribbica Penicillium expansum Apples [64] Chitosan + Pichia anomala Grapes [65] Methyl jasmonate + Meyerozyma guilliermondii Apples [66] Phytic acid + Rhodotorula mucilaginosa Botrytis cinerea Strawberries [67] Sodium bicarbonate + Kloeckera apiculate/Metschnikowia fructicola Cherry fruits [68] Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose + Rhodosporidium paludigenum Alternaria alternata Jujubes [69] Understanding the mechanisms of postharvest BCAs is a foundation for product development and registration. In general, research on biocontrol yeasts mainly includes four major modes of action: (1) antibiotic production; (2) competition for nutrients and space; (3) direct parasitism; and (4) induction of host resistance[70]. The fungal infection mechanism and resistance mechanisms of fruits against fungal pathogens are shown in Fig. 1.
Figure 1.
Fungal infection mechanism and resistance mechanisms of fruits against fungal pathogens after treatment with BCAs.
Antibiotic production
-
Antibiotics are a widely recognized mechanism for the biocontrol activity of microorganisms on fruit wounds, leaf surfaces, and rhizosphere[71]. For example, Pseudomonas aeruginosa could produce the glycolipid antibiotic rhamnolipid B that has the ability to inhibit postharvest disease of fruits and suppress the development of pathogen infection on leaf surfaces[72]. However, although the microorganisms that can produce antibiotics have the potential to be BCAs for the postharvest disease of fruits, due to their high risks and poor safety, the development focused on antagonistic microorganisms that do not produce antibiotics is becoming more necessary[73].
Competition for nutrients and space
-
It is interesting to note that the presence of antagonistic BCAs can have an impact on the postharvest disease of fruits. This is because microorganisms are constantly competing with each other and the host for resources like nutrients and space. The combination treatment of rhamnolipids and R. glutinis inhibited the spore germination of A. alternata in cherry tomatoes through destructing microbial cell membranes, reducing spore movement, and leading to spore collapse[62]. Furthermore, through the use of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), it has been observed that recombinant yeast GS115/CEC possessed the ability to degrade the DNA and RNA of A. alternata fungal cells. This yeast strain induced the expression of pathogenesis-related proteins, thereby effectively reducing postharvest decay in cherry tomatoes[74].
Direct parasitism
-
There is limited information concerning BCAs that directly attack and parasitize fungal pathogens in the postharvest area[71]. However, the yeast cells of Pichia guilliermondii and Debaryomyces hansenii were found to strongly attach to B. cinerea hyphae. When the yeast cells detached the B. cinerea hyphae, the hyphal surface showed signs of deterioration, and the attachment points showed evidence of partial B. cinerea cell wall breakdown. The partial degradation of the cell wall of B. cinerea by P. guilliermondii was related to its persistent attachment to hyphal walls in relation to its production of β-1,3-glucanase[75].
Induction of host resistance
-
The antagonistic yeasts can interact with the host tissue, particularly the wounds, and thereby enhance the process of cicatrization. It is confirmed that applying these antagonists before pathogen infection increases their effectiveness. Furthermore, through elicitors that are either produced or a component of their cell wall, yeast cells may trigger resistance processes in fruit skin[70]. Candida saitoana applied to apple wounds induced the activity of chitinase and structural barriers that develop along the walls of the host cell, like papillae[76]. A similar case was also found in apple wounds, in which Aureobasidium pullulans affected a transient increase in chitinase, β-1,3-glucanase, and peroxidase activities[77].
-
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
-
About this article
Cite this article
Raynaldo FA, Xu Y, Yolandani, Wang Q, Wu B, et al. 2024. Biological control and other alternatives to chemical fungicides in controlling postharvest disease of fruits caused by Alternaria alternata and Botrytis cinerea. Food Innovation and Advances 3(2): 135−143 doi: 10.48130/fia-0024-0014
Biological control and other alternatives to chemical fungicides in controlling postharvest disease of fruits caused by Alternaria alternata and Botrytis cinerea
- Received: 14 February 2024
- Revised: 16 May 2024
- Accepted: 16 May 2024
- Published online: 27 May 2024
Abstract: Alternaria alternata and Botrytis cinerea are among the primary fungal pathogens of fruits, causing black spot and gray mold disease, respectively. They cause serious losses in yield as well as affect fruit quality. Controlling fruit postharvest diseases largely relies on the use of chemical fungicides. However, the overuse of fungicides makes the produce unsafe due to their residual effects on the environment and human health. Therefore, significant advancements are necessary to investigate and find sustainable ways to prevent postharvest disease of fruits and minimize postharvest losses. This review summarizes the recent developments in the application of biological control and other sustainable approaches in managing fruit postharvest diseases, with an emphasis on A. alternata and B. cinerea, respectively. Furthermore, several action mechanisms, challenges, and prospects for the application of biological control agents (BCAs) are also discussed. Biological control application has been proven to successfully reduce postharvest disease of fruits caused by A. alternata and B. cinerea. In recent years, it has gradually changed from being primarily an independent field to a more crucial part of integrated pest management. Due to their characteristics that are safe, eco-friendly, and non-toxic, several BCAs have also been developed and commercialized. Therefore, biological control has the potential to be a promising approach to replace the use of chemical fungicides in controlling postharvest disease of fruits.
-
Key words:
- Biological control /
- Postharvest disease /
- Alternaria alternata /
- Botrytis cinerea /
- Sustainable methods