Search
2024 Volume 4
Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access    

Transcriptomic analyses reveal the effects of grafting on anthocyanin biosynthesis in crabapple

  • # Authors contributed equally: Mengnan Zhao, Sifan Wang

More Information
  • Anthocyanins are crucial plant pigments that enhance plant color and bolster resistance. Grafting is an ancient cultivation technology in Malus production, and it has important effects on plant phenotypes, secondary metabolism, biotic, and abiotic resistance. However, the underlying genetic and regulatory mechanisms effects on anthocyanin biosynthesis are unclear. In this research, the phenotypic and transcriptome variation in Malus crabapple cv. 'Indian Magic' (Spring-red-leaf) and Malus Crabapple cv. 'Flame' (evergreen leaf) serving as either rootstock or scion (F/I, I/F) and self-grafted (I/I) as control were explored. The results showed that the anthocyanin accumulation in the stem of 'Flame' grafted onto 'Indian Magic' occurred rather than being induced by wounding and other stresses. Based on KEGG analyses, it was deduced that the anthocyanin accumulation is mainly induced by 'plant hormone signal transduction', 'starch and sucrose metabolism', and the 'MAPK signaling pathway'. Moreover, transcriptomic analyses also revealed MdSAUR20 was highly induced during grafting, potentially playing a pivotal role in grafting-induced anthocyanin accumulation, as confirmed by transgenic assay. These results propose new insight into regulating anthocyanin biosynthesis and contributing signal transport in grafting, contributing to a better understanding of the selection and combination of scion and rootstock in the grafting process.
  • 加载中
  • Supplemental Table S1 Primers were used in this study.
    Supplemental Table S2 DEGs in KEGG enrichment in 'Plant hormone signal transduction', 'Starch and sucrose metabolism', 'MAPK signaling pathway'.
    Supplemental Table S3 Information of DEGs in the comparison of F-I-S vs I-F-R.
  • [1]

    Tian J, Peng Z, Zhang J, Song T, Wan H, et al. 2015. McMYB10 regulates coloration via activating McF3'H and later structural genes in ever-red leaf crabapple. Plant Biotechnology Journal 13:948−61

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.12331

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Tai D, Tian J, Zhang J, Song T, Yao Y. 2014. A Malus crabapple chalcone synthase gene, McCHS, regulates red petal color and flavonoid biosynthesis. PLoS One 9:e110570

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110570

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Saito K, Yonekura-Sakakibara K, Nakabayashi R, Higashi Y, Yamazaki M, et al. 2013. The flavonoid biosynthetic pathway in Arabidopsis: structural and genetic diversity. Plant Physiology Biochemistry 72:21−34

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.02.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Ban Y, Honda C, Hatsuyama Y, Igarashi M, Bessho H, et al. 2007. Isolation and functional analysis of a MYB transcription factor gene that is a key regulator for the development of red coloration in apple skin. Plant Cell Physiology 48:958−70

    doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcm066

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Espley RV, Hellens RP, Putterill J, Stevenson DE, Kutty-Amma S, et al. 2007. Red colouration in apple fruit is due to the activity of the MYB transcription factor, MdMYB10. The Plant Journal 49:414−27

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02964.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Takos AM, Jaffé FW, Jacob SR, Bogs J, Robinson SP, et al. 2006. Light-induced expression of a MYB gene regulates anthocyanin biosynthesis in red apples. Plant Physiology 142:1216−32

    doi: 10.1104/pp.106.088104

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Yang T, Ma H, Li Y, Zhang Y, Zhang J, et al. 2021. Apple MPK4 mediates phosphorylation of MYB1 to enhance light-induced anthocyanin accumulation. The Plant Journal 106:1728−45

    doi: 10.1111/tpj.15267

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Wang S, Li L, Zhang Z, Fang Y, Li D, Chen X et al. 2022. Ethylene precisely regulates anthocyanin synthesis in apple via a module comprising MdEIL1, MdMYB1, and MdMYB17. Horticulture Research 9:uhac034

    doi: 10.1093/hr/uhac034

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    An J, Zhang X, Liu Y, Wang X, You C, et al. 2021. ABI5 regulates ABA-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis by modulating the MYB1-bHLH3 complex in apple. Journal of Experimental Botany 72:1460−72

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa525

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Qi T, Song S, Ren Q, Wu D, Huang H, Chen Y, et al. 2011. The Jasmonate-ZIM-domain proteins interact with the WD-repeat/ bHLH/MYB complexes to regulate jasmonate-mediated anthocyanin accumulation and trichome initiation in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Cell 23:1795−814

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.083261

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Wang Y, Wang N, Xu H, Jiang S, Fang H, et al. 2018. Auxin regulates anthocyanin biosynthesis through the Aux/IAA-ARF signaling pathway in apple. Horticulture Research 5:59

    doi: 10.1038/s41438-018-0068-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Xie Y, Tan H, Ma Z, Huang J. 2016. DELLA proteins promote anthocyanin biosynthesis via sequestering MYBL2 and JAZ suppressors of the MYB/bHLH/WD40 complex in Arabidopsis thaliana. Molecular Plant 9:711−21

    doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2016.01.014

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Luo J, Zhou J, Zhang J. 2018. Aux/IAA gene family in plants: molecular structure, regulation, and function. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19:259

    doi: 10.3390/ijms19010259

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Wang P, Lu S, Xie M, Wu M, Ding S, et al. 2020. Identification and expression analysis of the small auxin-up RNA (SAUR) gene family in apple by inducing of auxin. Gene 750:144725

    doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2020.144725

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Spartz AK, Lee SH, Wenger JP, Gonzalez N, Itoh H, et al. 2012. The SAUR19 subfamily of SMALL AUXIN UP RNA genes promote cell expansion. The Plant Journal 70:978−90

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.04946.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Tian Z, Wu B, Liu J, Zhang L, Wu T, et al. 2024. Genetic variations in MdSAUR36 participate in the negative regulation of mesocarp cell division and fruit size in Malus species. Molecular Breeding 44:1

    doi: 10.1007/s11032-024-01441-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Yang Y, Huang M, Qi L, Song J, Li Q, et al. 2017. Differential expression analysis of genes related to graft union healing in Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim by cDNA-AFLP. Scientia Horticulturae 225:700−06

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2017.07.028

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Li D, Han F, Liu X, Lv H, Li L, et al. 2021. Localized graft incompatibility in kiwifruit: analysis of homografts and heterografts with different rootstock & scion combinations. Scientia Horticulturae 283:110080

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110080

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Chen Z, Zhao J, Hu F, Qin Y, Wang X, et al. 2017. Transcriptome changes between compatible and incompatible graft combination of Litchi chinensis by digital gene expression profile. Scientific Reports 7:3954

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04328-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Melnyk CW, Meyerowitz EM. 2015. Plant grafting. Current Biology 25:R183−R188

    doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.029

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Li H, Testerink C, Zhang Y. 2021. How roots and shoots communicate through stressful times. Trends in Plant Science 26:940−52

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2021.03.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Duan X, Zhang W, Huang J, Hao L, Wang S, et al. 2016. PbWoxT1 mRNA from pear (Pyrus betulaefolia) undergoes long-distance transport assisted by a polypyrimidine tract binding protein. New Phytologist 210:511−24

    doi: 10.1111/nph.13793

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Kurotani KI, Notaguchi M. 2021. Cell-to-cell connection in plant grafting-molecular insights into symplasmic reconstruction. Plant and Cell Physiology 62:1362−71

    doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcab109

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Lv X, Sun Y, Hao P, Zhang C, Tian J, et al. 2021. RBP differentiation contributes to selective transmissibility of OPT3 mRNAs. Plant Physiology 187:1587−604

    doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab366

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Hao P, Lv X, Fu M, Xu Z, Tian J, et al. 2022. Long-distance mobile mRNA CAX3 modulates iron uptake and zinc compartmentalization. EMBO Reports 23:e53698

    doi: 10.15252/embr.202153698

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Zhang F, Zhong H, Zhou X, Pan M, Xu J, et al. 2022. Grafting with rootstocks promotes phenolic compound accumulation in grape berry skin during development based on integrative multi-omics analysis. Horticulture Research 9:uhac055

    doi: 10.1093/hr/uhac055

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Huang N, Yu T. 2021. Non-sterile grafting methods for Arabidopsis. In Arabidopsis Protocols, Sanchez-Serrano JJ, Salinas J. Humana, New York, NY. 2200:113−19. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0880-7_4

    [28]

    Zhang J, Xu H, Wang N, Jiang S, Fang H, et al. 2018. The ethylene response factor MdERF1B regulates anthocyanin and proanthocyanidin biosynthesis in apple. Plant Molecular Biology 98:205−18

    doi: 10.1007/s11103-018-0770-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    An J, Zhang X, You C, Bi S, Wang X, et al. 2019. MdWRKY40 promotes wounding-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis in association with MdMYB1 and undergoes MdBT2-mediated degradation. New Phytologist 224:380−95

    doi: 10.1111/nph.16008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    An J, Wang X, Zhang X, Xu H, Bi S, et al. 2020. An apple MYB transcription factor regulates cold tolerance and anthocyanin accumulation and undergoes MIEL1-mediated degradation. Plant Biotechnology Journal 18:337−53

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.13201

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. 2014. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biology 15:550

    doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Kanehisa M, Goto S. 2000. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Research 28:27−30

    doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.27

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Salas E, Dueñas M, Schwarz M, Winterhalter P, Cheynier V, et al. 2005. Characterization of pigments from different high speed countercurrent chromatography wine fractions. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 53:4536–46

    doi: 10.1021/jf0478096

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Wang S, Li L, Fang Y, Li D, Mao Z, et al. 2022. MdERF1B-MdMYC2 module integrates ethylene and jasmonic acid to regulate the biosynthesis of anthocyanin in apple. Horticulture Research 9:uhac142

    doi: 10.1093/hr/uhac142

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Liu Y, Zhang X, Liu X, Zheng P, Su L, et al. 2022. Phytochrome interacting factor MdPIF7 modulates anthocyanin biosynthesis and hypocotyl growth in apple. Plant Physiology 188:2342−63

    doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab605

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCᴛ method. Methods 25:402−08

    doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Zhong H, Liu Z, Zhang F, Zhou X, Sun X, et al. 2022. Metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses reveal the effects of self- and hetero-grafting on anthocyanin biosynthesis in grapevine. Horticulture Research 9:uhac103

    doi: 10.1093/hr/uhac103

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Holton TA, Cornish EC. 1995. Genetics and biochemistry of anthocyanin biosynthesis. The Plant Cell 7:1071−83

    doi: 10.2307/3870058

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Winkel-Shirley B. 2001. Flavonoid biosynthesis. A colorful model for genetics, biochemistry, cell biology, and biotechnology. Plant Physiology 126:485−93

    doi: 10.1104/pp.126.2.485

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Andersen OM, Markham KR. 2006. Flavonoids. Chemistry, biochemistry and application. Boca Raton: CRC Press. 1256 pp. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420039443

    [41]

    Osugi A, Kojima M, Takebayashi Y, Ueda N, Kiba T, et al. 2017. Systemic transport of trans-zeatin and its precursor have differing roles in Arabidopsis shoots. Nature Plants 3:17112

    doi: 10.1038/nplants.2017.112

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Wang Y, Chen W, Gao X, He L, Yang X, et al. 2019. Rootstock-mediated effects on cabernet sauvignon performance: vine growth, berry ripening, flavonoids, and aromatic profiles. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20:401

    doi: 10.3390/ijms20020401

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Li W, Mao J, Yang S, Guo Z, Ma Z, et al. 2018. Anthocyanin accumulation correlates with hormones in the fruit skin of 'Red Delicious' and its four generation bud sport mutants. BMC Plant Biology 18:363

    doi: 10.1186/s12870-018-1595-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Loreti E, Povero G, Novi G, Solfanelli C, Alpi A, et al. 2008. Gibberellins, jasmonate and abscisic acid modulate the sucrose-induced expression of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes in Arabidopsis. New Phytologist 179:1004−16

    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02511.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Li H, Liu Z, Wang X, Han Y, You C, et al. 2023. E3 ubiquitin ligases SINA4 and SINA11 regulate anthocyanin biosynthesis by targeting the IAA29-ARF5-1-ERF3 module in apple. Plant, Cell & Environment 46: 3902–18

    doi: 10.1111/pce.14709

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Zhao M, Wang S, Chen L, Zhang J, Yao Y, et al. 2024. Transcriptomic analyses reveal the effects of grafting on anthocyanin biosynthesis in crabapple. Ornamental Plant Research 4: e021 doi: 10.48130/opr-0024-0018
    Zhao M, Wang S, Chen L, Zhang J, Yao Y, et al. 2024. Transcriptomic analyses reveal the effects of grafting on anthocyanin biosynthesis in crabapple. Ornamental Plant Research 4: e021 doi: 10.48130/opr-0024-0018

Figures(6)  /  Tables(1)

Article Metrics

Article views(1290) PDF downloads(252)

ARTICLE   Open Access    

Transcriptomic analyses reveal the effects of grafting on anthocyanin biosynthesis in crabapple

Ornamental Plant Research  4 Article number: e021  (2024)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Anthocyanins are crucial plant pigments that enhance plant color and bolster resistance. Grafting is an ancient cultivation technology in Malus production, and it has important effects on plant phenotypes, secondary metabolism, biotic, and abiotic resistance. However, the underlying genetic and regulatory mechanisms effects on anthocyanin biosynthesis are unclear. In this research, the phenotypic and transcriptome variation in Malus crabapple cv. 'Indian Magic' (Spring-red-leaf) and Malus Crabapple cv. 'Flame' (evergreen leaf) serving as either rootstock or scion (F/I, I/F) and self-grafted (I/I) as control were explored. The results showed that the anthocyanin accumulation in the stem of 'Flame' grafted onto 'Indian Magic' occurred rather than being induced by wounding and other stresses. Based on KEGG analyses, it was deduced that the anthocyanin accumulation is mainly induced by 'plant hormone signal transduction', 'starch and sucrose metabolism', and the 'MAPK signaling pathway'. Moreover, transcriptomic analyses also revealed MdSAUR20 was highly induced during grafting, potentially playing a pivotal role in grafting-induced anthocyanin accumulation, as confirmed by transgenic assay. These results propose new insight into regulating anthocyanin biosynthesis and contributing signal transport in grafting, contributing to a better understanding of the selection and combination of scion and rootstock in the grafting process.

    • Malus crabapple, a member of the Rosaceae family within the genus Malus, possesses an ornamental apple germplasm collection, representing an economically significant resource[1,2]. Commercial value in numerous ornamental plant species is strongly influenced by leaf color, and crabapple cultivars exhibit a diverse array of leaf colors. The variety of crabapple with red leaves has emerged as a significant breeding objective in recent years due to its high ornamental and landscaping value, which is widely appreciated by people.

      Anthocyanins, members of the flavonoid family, play a role in imparting red coloration to crabapple leaves. The pathway for anthocyanin biosynthesis has been identified, including chalcone synthase (CHS), chalcone isomerase (CHI), flavanone 3-hydroxylase (F3H), dihydroflavonol 4-reductase (DFR), anthocyanidin synthase (ANS), UDP-glucose/flavonoid 3-O-glucosyltransferase (UFGT). Meanwhile, anthocyanin synthesis is also coordinated regulation by the MBW complex, consisting of MYB, basic helix-loop-helix proteins (bHLH), and WD40 proteins[3]. In apple, functional assays revealed MdMYB1, MdMYB10, and MdMYBA as crucial regulators of anthocyanin biosynthesis. This regulation occurs through their interaction with bHLH3 and WD40 proteins, activating the expression of genes involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis[46]. In land plants, anthocyanin biosynthesis is also induced by endogenous plant hormones[7]. Ethylene response factor gene (ERF), abscisic acid response factor gene (ABF), and jasmonic acid (JA) response factor gene have been identified as activating the expression of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes, thus promoting anthocyanin accumulation[810]. Auxin and GA negatively regulate anthocyanin biosynthesis by triggering the degradation of auxin/indole-3-acetic acid (AUX/IAA) and DELLA proteins, respectively[11,12]. There were several major classes of auxin-responsive genes in plants that responded to changes in auxin levels, including the Auxin/Indole-3-Acetic Acid (Aux/IAA) family, the auxin response factor (ARF) family, small auxin upregulated RNA (SAUR), and the auxin-responsive Gretchen Hagen3 (GH3) family[13]. Among these SAURs are the most rapid auxin-responsive genes related to the auxin signaling pathway[14]. Then, the gene function of the SAURs family have been identified in various plants, AtSAUR19–24 were verified as positive regulators of plant cell expansion[15]. MdSAUR36 was confirmed to participate in the negative regulation of mesocarp cell division and fruit size in Malus species[16]. However, the function of anthocyanin synthesis of SAUR family members still needs further study.

      Grafting in plants, a conventional technique for asexual propagation typically involves joining two plant segments. It serves to propagate consistent seedlings of several valuable fruit species, enhance disease and stress resistance, and prevent a juvenile state. This method is extensively applied in modern horticultural production, including crops like apple, citrus, pear, grape, kiwifruit, and lychee[1720].

      Grafting involves the physical connection of separate plant parts, where rootstock and scion share an interconnected vascular system. Within this system, several small peptides, proteins and RNA molecules have been identified as mobile in xylem or phloem, capable of triggering physiological variations through the graft junction, leading to enhanced vigor[2123]. Studies involving apple genotypes have demonstrated that oligopeptide transporter 3 (MdOPT3) mRNA can traverse long distances, from the leaf to the root, regulating iron uptake[24]. Furthermore, MdCAX3 mRNA has been observed to move from leaves to roots, contributing to the control of iron and zinc homeostasis under iron-starvation conditions[25]. Recent researchers have also demonstrated that secondary metabolites can be promoted by grafting with rootstocks in plants. For instance, in grapevines, heterografting enhances the accumulation of flavonoids in grape berry skin during development, accompanied by an increase in the transcription of related biosynthesis genes[26]. However, there is limited available data concerning the impact of different rootstocks on the dynamic changes in anthocyanin accumulation in crabapple leaves.

      In this study, the focus was on investigating the impact of diverse scion-rootstock combinations on physiological parameters and gene transcription in crabapple leaves. Malus crabapple cv. 'Indian Magic' (Spring-red-leaf) and Malus Crabapple cv. 'Flame' (evergreen leaf) were employed as either rootstock or scion (F/I, I/F), and self-grafted (I/I) served as the control. The aim was to identify key anthocyanin regulatory genes through RNA-seq analysis. The results demonstrated a significant accumulation of anthocyanin in the stem of 'Flame' within the I/F combination, with MdSAUR20 identified as a candidate regulator during the grafting process. The present investigation contributes to an enhanced understanding of the selection and combination of scion and rootstock in the grafting process, providing valuable insights for Malus breeding.

    • Malus crabapple cv. 'Flame' (evergreen leaf) and Malus crabapple cv. 'Indian Magic' (Spring-red-leaf) were selected for this experiment. Before grafting, Malus plants were grown in Murashig and Skoog (MS) medium for 1 month. The grafted plants were used for phenotypic observation and sampling for RNA-seq. Grafting of crabapple was performed using an insect pin into the scion as previously described[27]. Grafting combinations were as follows: 'Flame' as scion and 'Indian Magic' as rootstock (F/I), 'Indian Magic' as scion and 'Flame' as rootstock (I/F); self-grafted 'Flame'/'Flame' (F/F) and 'Indian Magic'/'Indian Magi' (I/I) were used as control[2830].

    • Total RNA was extracted from the stem of scions and rootstocks and seedling samples using an RNA Extraction Kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Further, RNA-seq libraries were constructed and sequenced on NovaSeq platform. Hisat2 v2.0.5 was used to align clean reads to the apple genome. Featuretsv1.5.0-p3 was used to map read numbers to each gene. Differential expression analysis was performed using the DESeq2 R package (1.16.1)[31]. KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) pathways were tested by KOBAS software[32].

    • Frozen stem of Malus crabapple and seedlings samples (0.1 g fresh weight) were ground in 1 mL extraction buffer (methanol:formic acid:water = 80:1:19). The pH-differential method to measure the total content anthocyanin was carried out as referenced by Salas et al.[33]. Total anthocyanin contents were quantified spectrophotometrically at 530 and 700 nm as previously described[34].

    • 'Red Fuji' apple peel cDNA was used as a template to clone the full-length of MdSAUR20 (MD05G1052200) (primer information is listed in Supplemental Table S1). The MdSAUR20 coding sequence was cloned into the pRI101-eGFP vector for gene overexpression of apple tissue culture seedlings (M. domestica cv. 'Golden Delicious') were grown in a subculture medium (MS +1 mg/L 6-BA + 0.2 mg/L NAA + 0.5 mg/L GA) under long-day conditions (16-h light/8-h darkness, 24 °C). Transgenic seedlings were obtained by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and vacuum extraction. For detailed transient methods refer to the previous study by Liu et al.[35].

    • Quantitative real-time PCR analysis was proceeded with SYBR Green qPCR kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The data were analyzed using the internal control and the 2−ΔΔCᴛ method[36]. Primer sequences are listed in Supplemental Table S1.

    • To examine the impact of rootstock on scion anthocyanin accumulation during grafting, various scion-rootstock combinations were generated. The results revealed significant anthocyanin accumulation in the stem in the F/I combination, indicating the influence of rootstock on scion pigmentation. In Fig. 1a, when the spring red cultivar 'Indian Magic' served as the rootstock, the green stem of the evergreen cultivar 'Flame' turned red. Meanwhile, there was also anthocyanin accumulation in the stem of 'Indian Magic' when 'Flame' was used as rootstock. To distinguish whether anthocyanin accumulation in the stem of 'Flame' resulted from grafting rather than other stresses, we used F/F and I/I combinations as controls. Anthocyanin was not detected in the stem of 'Flame' when 'Flame' was used as rootstock, and the stem of 'Indian Magic' maintained a red color when 'Indian Magic' was used as rootstock. The results confirmed that the 'Indian Magic' rootstock promoted anthocyanin accumulation in the stem of the 'Flame' scion. Paraffin sections were conducted to observe the stem's cross-section, revealing a hollow in the vascular system, indicating a vascular connection between the rootstock and scion in F/I (Fig. 1b). In summary, the use of an anthocyanin-rich cultivar as rootstock may influence anthocyanin accumulation through signaling mechanisms during grafting.

      Figure 1. 

      Grafting affects anthocyanin accumulation in F/I combination. (a) Phenotype of grafted seedlings with differential grafting combinations (red arrows indicate the bonding sites of scion and rootstock, the black circle is the anthocyanin accumulation area) (F/F: Malus crabapple cv. 'Flame' as scion and Malus crabapple cv. 'Flame' as rootstock; F/I: Malus crabapple cv. 'Flame' as scion and Malus crabapple cv. 'Indian Magic' as rootstock; I/F: Malus crabapple cv. 'Indian Magic' as scion and Malus crabapple cv. 'Flame' as rootstock; I/I: Malus crabapple cv. 'Indian Magic' as scion and rootstock). (b) Paraffin section of the interface in non-grafted and grafted seedlings.

    • To gain an in-depth comprehension of the regulatory mechanism of anthocyanin accumulation during grafting, the stems of scions (-S) and rootstocks (-R) in F/I, I/F, I/I combinations were used as materials for transcriptome sequencing. Three biological replicates for each combination were investigated, and clean reads ranged from 38,688,774 to 52,734,680, between 85.3% to 88.71% of the sequenced reads aligned with the apple reference genome. All 18 libraries exhibited Q30 percentages surpassing 93% (Table 1). Pearson correlation analysis and principle component analysis demonstrated highly correlated transcriptome characteristics among the biological replicates in differential grafting combinations (R2 = 0.747 − 0.962) (Fig. 2a). A principle component analysis also indicated that F-I-S and I-F-R were more separated from other samples (Fig. 2b). These findings suggest that the main differences induced by grafting occur in the scion of 'F/I' and the rootstock of 'I-F'.

      Table 1.  RNA sequencing data.

      Sample
      name
      Clean reads% ≥ Q30Total readsMapped reads
      I-I-R-126,367,34093.2652,734,68045,507,642 (86.3%)
      I-I-R-222,928,73993.2145,857,47839,118,647 (85.3%)
      I-I-R-322,104,19193.9944,208,38238,710,947 (87.56%)
      I-I-S-123,790,35093.8947,580,70041,410,502 (87.03%)
      I-I-S-223,041,21693.2946,082,43240,172,269 (87.17%)
      I-I-S-323,120,81793.0046,241,63440,433,561 (87.44%)
      I-F-S-123,048,14094.0046,096,28040,314,380 (87.46%)
      I-F-S-222,692,49793.9045,384,99440,033,821 (88.21%)
      I-F-S-319,344,38793.0038,688,77433,125,491 (85.62%)
      I-F-R-122,931,22694.3745,862,45240,818,713 (89.0%)
      I-F-R-222,311,55293.0644,623,10438,436,230 (86.14%)
      I-F-R-322,713,77693.8445,427,55239,092,461 (86.05%)
      F-I-S-122,724,01894.1545,448,03640,037,863 (88.1%)
      F-I-S-223,260,09693.9346,520,19239,871,870 (85.71%)
      F-I-S-322,846,84194.0545,693,68240,535,794 (88.71%)
      F-I-R-123,151,62294.0646,303,24441,035,064 (88.62%)
      F-I-R-225,981,53694.1951,963,07245,465,386 (87.5%)
      F-I-R-323,629,46794.1947,258,93441,551,698 (87.92%)
      Clean reads: number of reads after raw data filtering; % ≥ Q30: Percentage of total bases with Phred values greater than 30; Total reads: number of clean reads of sequencing data after quality control; Mapped reads: number of reads matched to the genome and their percentages.

      Figure 2. 

      Transcriptome analyses of stem of scions and rootstock in different grafting combinations. (a) Pearson correlation between samples (the horizontal and vertical coordinates of the graph are the square of the correlation coefficient of each sample). (b) Principal component analysis of samples.

    • To detect differentially expressed genes in scion and rootstock across F/I, I/F, I/I combinations, comparisons were conducted as follows: F-I-S vs I-F-R, F-I-R vs I-I-R, and I-F-S vs I-I-S, and the sequenced genes were filtered using |log2(foldchange)| > 0 and rate (FDR) < 0.05 as the screening criteria. In F-I-S vs I-F-R, 145 DEGs were found that met the filtering criteria, comprising 85 up-regulated and 60 down-regulated DEGs (Fig. 3a). For F-I-R vs I-I-R, 205 DEGs were filtered, comprising 188 up-regulated and 17 down-regulated DEGs (Fig. 3b). In I-F-S vs I-I-S, 747 DEGs were filtered, with 433 DEGs up-regulated and 314 DEGs down-regulated (Fig. 3c). The maximum number of DEGs in I-F-S vs I-I-S suggests that grafting in different rootstocks results in significant differential gene expression.

      Figure 3. 

      The number of differential expressed genes for compare group. The horizontal coordinate is the log2(foldchange) value, the vertical coordinate is −log10(padj) or −log10(pvalue), and the threshold line for the differential gene screening criteria.

      To elucidate the clustering pattern of DEGs, KEGG analyses was conducted for the three grafting combinations: F-I-S vs I-F-R, F-I-S vs I-I-R, and I-F-S vs I-I-S. KEGG analysis aimed to discern the biological functions of the identified DEGs through pairwise comparisons. Compared F-I-S with I-F-R, these DEGs were with enrichment in the following pathways: 'Plant hormone signal transduction', 'Starch and sucrose metabolism', 'MAPK signaling pathway', 'Arginine and proline metabolism', 'Diterpenoid biosynthesis' (Fig. 4a). F-I-R in contrast to I-I-R, the results confirmed that DEGs were enrichment in the following pathways: 'Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism', 'Plant pathogen interaction', 'MAPK signaling pathway', 'Plant hormone signal transduction' (Fig. 4b). Moreover, comparing I-F-S with I-I-S, the results suggested that the DEGs were enriched in the 'ribosome', 'carbon metabolism' 'starch and sucrose metabolism', 'phenylpropanoid biosynthesis', 'amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism' (Fig. 4c). According to the KEGG analyses, it was deduced that the accumulation of anthocyanin was mainly mediated by 'plant hormone signal transduction', 'Starch and sucrose metabolism', 'MAPK signaling pathway', 'arginine and proline metabolism'. Meanwhile, Auxin related genes auxin-induced protein AUX28, SAUR32-like, IAA3-like, and gibberellin receptor GID1B-like were identified in the 'Plant hormone signal transduction' pathway, which suggested that auxin and GA may have important roles in the grafting process (Supplemental Table S2). To understand the biological processes involved in grafting in different combinations, Gene Ontology (GO) analysis was performed. DEGs in the 'cell periphery', 'external encapsulating structure' and 'cell wall' terms were significantly enriched in F-I-S vs I-F-R. In F-I-R vs I-I-R, the DEGs were enriched in the 'cell periphery', 'extracellular region', and 'calcium ion binding' terms. Comparing I-F-S vs I-I-S, these DEGs were enriched in the 'intracellular non-membrane bounded organelle', 'non-membrane bounded organelle', 'ribonucleoprotein complex', and 'ribosome' terms.

      Figure 4. 

      Functional analysis of differentially expressed genes between grafting combinations. (a) KEGG enrich analyses in F-I-S vs I-F-R, (b) KEGG enrich analyses in F-I-R vs I-I-R, (c) KEGG enrich analyses in I-F-S vs I-I-S, (d) GO enrich analyses in F-I-S vs I-F-R, (e) GO enrich analyses in F-I-R vs I-I-R, (f) GO enrich analyses in I-F-S vs I-I-S.

    • To identify key anthocyanin regulators during grafting in crabapple, we focused on DEGs that met the criteria |log2(foldchange)| > 2 and false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05 between different combinations. In the comparison of F-I-S vs I-F-R, there were 120 DEGs listed in Supplemental Table S3. Among them, three transcription factors MdSAUR20-like (MD05G1052200), MdbHLH137 (MD06G1133200), MdbHLH63-like (MD05G1065100) were identified and the variation of expression level of these three TFs in the comparison. Notably, MdSAUR20 showed the highest expression in F-I-S. The expression level of MdSAUR20 was also analyzed by qRT-PCR, and the results showed that MdSAUR20 in the stem of 'Flame' in F-I-S was significantly higher than that in the stem of 'Indian Magic' I-F-S, suggesting its potential role as a key signaling factor for anthocyanin accumulation in the scion during the grafting process (Fig. 5b).

      Figure 5. 

      Analysis of genes associated with anthocyanin biosynthesis during grafting. (a) Heatmap describing the expression of candidate transcription factors. (b) Relative expression levels of MdSAUR20 in F-I-S and I-F-R. (c) The content of anthocyanin in F/F vs F/I. (d) Schematic diagrams of the MdSAUR20 promoters. The error bars indicate the SD of three biological replicates. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01) according to Student's t test.

      To unravel the transcriptional regulatory mechanism of MdSAUR20, cis-elements in the promoter region of MdSAUR20 were examined using the PlantCARE database. The analysis identified the presence of TGACG, CGTCA-motif, ABRE, and TCA motifs in the MdSAUR20 promoter. From this, it can be inferred that the expression of MdSAUR20 could potentially be triggered by Indole acetic acid (IAA), Methyl Jasmonate (MeJA), Abscisic acid (ABA) and Salicylic acid (SA) (Fig. 5d).

      To further investigate the role of MdSAUR20 in anthocyanin biosynthesis, overexpression assays were conducted in apple tissue culture seedlings (M. domestica cv. 'Golden Delicious') using the vector pRI101-eGFP vector. The seedling transformed with pRI101-MdSAUR20-eGFP exhibited a noticeable color difference compared to the control (Fig. 6a). Measurement of anthocyanin analysis further confirmed an increase in anthocyanin accumulation in the MdSAUR20 overexpressed seedling (Fig. 6b). qRT-PCR results demonstrated significantly elevated transcription levels of anthocyanin biosynthesis genes, including MdCHS, MdCHI, MdF3H, MdDFR, MdANS and MdUFGT genes, in the MdSAUR20 overexpressed seedling compared to the control (Fig. 6c).

      Figure 6. 

      Functional assay of in MdSAUR20. (a) Pigmented transgenic cells were formed in seedling transformed with OE-MdSAUR20. Scale bar = 1 cm (b) Anthocyanin content in inoculated apple tissue culture seedlings. (c) Relative expression levels of MdSAUR20 in seedlings and anthocyanin biosynthesis genes. Data are presented as mean values ± SD of three independent biological replicates. Asterisks indicate significant difference by Student's t-test.

    • Grafting stands as a crucial agricultural method, elevating the vigor and characteristics of the scion, impacting various aspects such as fruit quality, fruit color, environmental and disease stress resistance[37]. Anthocyanins, the primary pigments in Malus plants, assume vital functions in multiple physiological and biochemical processes, encompassing UV protection, insect attraction, herbivore defense[3840]. Therefore, the utilization of cultivars with elevated anthocyanin content as rootstocks have significant production importance. However, the molecular regulatory mechanisms governing anthocyanin biosynthesis during grafting in Malus plants remain unclear. In the present study, the evergreen cultivar 'Flame' and the spring-red-leaf cultivar 'Indian Magic' were selected as grafting materials. The results revealed that the accumulation of anthocyanin was induced in the 'Flame' when 'Indian Magic' was used as the rootstock. Furthermore, through RNA-seq analysis, MdSAUR20 was identified as a crucial regulator of anthocyanin during grafting.

      Grafting can modify scion phenotypes through the uptake and transport of water, nutrients, hormones, and long-distance movement of biological molecules[37]. Micrografting experiments in Arabidopsis, employing different mutants related to cytokinin biosynthesis and transport demonstrated that the regulation of shoot architecture is influenced by the root-to-shoot translocation of trans-zeatin riboside and trans-zeatin[41]. In blood oranges, eight developmental stages of the lido blood orange cultivar grafted onto two rootstocks, and global transcriptome and metabolome results revealed that flavonoid-accumulating rootstocks predominantly influence the fruit quality of the scion[37]. In grape, the metabolomic analysis of Cabernet Sauvignon cultivar grafted onto different rootstocks and onto itself demonstrated that grafting promotes the accumulation of stilbenes, anthocyanins, PAs, and flavonols[41,42]. Phenotypic, metabolomic, and transcriptomic results also indicated that grafting the Crimson Seedless cultivar onto four rootstocks could enhance berry color[37]. These results suggest that various rootstocks have the potential ability to improve anthocyanin accumulation in fruit through grafting. However, the molecular mechanism and signal transport mode remain unclear. In the present results, it was observed that 'Indian Magic' rootstock promoted anthocyanin accumulation in the stem of 'Flame' scion. KEGG analysis further suggested that anthocyanin accumulation in the scions of 'Flame' grafted onto 'Indian Magic' rootstock may be mediated by plant hormones, starch, and sucrose, or other signal transduction pathways. We speculate that variations in anthocyanin accumulation during grafting depend on differentially expressed genes and the transmission of multiple signaling pathways.

      Plant hormones are likely to be important factors that modulate light-dependent anthocyanin accumulation. Previous investigations have demonstrated the existence of crosstalk between hormone signaling pathways and anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway, IAA enhanced the cytokinin-induced increase in anthocyanin levels in Arabidopsis and M. domastic cv. 'Red Delicious'[43,44]. In apple, auxin response factor MdARF13 negatively regulates anthocyanin biosynthesis by interacting with MdMYB10 and MdIAA121 interacts with MdARF13 to weaken the inhibition of anthocyanin biosynthesis[11]. And other studies found that the E3 ubiquitin ligases MdSINA4 and MdSINA11 were involved in auxin-mediated anthocyanin regulation by triggering the ubiquitination degradation of MdIAA29 and MdARF5 which auxin suggested plays a key role in mediating the inhibition of anthocyanin biosynthesis[45]. In conclusion, the identification of DEGs between F-I-S and I-F-R suggests that MdSAUR20 (MD05G1052200) may be induced by plant hormones and serves as a regulator of anthocyanin biosynthesis during grafting.

    • In summary, the comprehensive phenotypic and transcriptomic analyses during grafting have provided valuable insights into anthocyanin synthesis. These findings reveal noteworthy alterations in transcriptional patterns related to color regulation under diverse grafting conditions, presenting implications for the improvement and breeding of Malus plants.

    • The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: experiments design: Tian J, Yao Y; experiments performing: Zhao M, Wang S, Chen L; data analysis: Zhao M, Wang S, Zhang J; reagents/materials contributing: Tian J, Yao Y; manuscript writing: Zhao M, Wang S. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

    • RNA-sequencing data in this study have been deposited in the NCBI Bioproject database under accession number (PRJNA1066043, https://dataview.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/object/PRJNA1066043).

      • We thank the Beijing Nursery Engineering Research Center for Fruit Crops and the Key Laboratory of New Technology in Agricultural Application of Beijing for providing experimental resources. Financial support was provided by National Forestry and Grassland Administration-the Third Forestry and Grassland Science and Technology Youth Talent Program (202320132004), the Science and Technology innovation support program of Beijing University of Agriculture (BUA-HHXD2022001).

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • # Authors contributed equally: Mengnan Zhao, Sifan Wang

      • Copyright: © 2024 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (6)  Table (1) References (45)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Zhao M, Wang S, Chen L, Zhang J, Yao Y, et al. 2024. Transcriptomic analyses reveal the effects of grafting on anthocyanin biosynthesis in crabapple. Ornamental Plant Research 4: e021 doi: 10.48130/opr-0024-0018
    Zhao M, Wang S, Chen L, Zhang J, Yao Y, et al. 2024. Transcriptomic analyses reveal the effects of grafting on anthocyanin biosynthesis in crabapple. Ornamental Plant Research 4: e021 doi: 10.48130/opr-0024-0018

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return