Search
2024 Volume 3
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

A review on the advances of dragon fruit

More Information
  • Received: 20 August 2024
    Revised: 03 October 2024
    Accepted: 17 October 2024
    Published online: 12 December 2024
    Tropical Plants  3 Article number: e041 (2024)  |  Cite this article
  • Over ten years of rapid development, dragon fruit has become China's fifth major South Asian subtropical horticultural fruit, following lychee, longan, banana, and mango. As a climbing cactus, dragon fruit possesses lots of unique biological characteristics, such as blooming at night, being rich in betalains substances, and self-incompatibility. In recent years, with the publication of dragon fruit genomes, the molecular basis of forming dragon fruit's biological characteristics has been extensively studied and explored. This review gives a glimpse into the research progress on biological characteristics, germplasm resource classification, and genome sequencing of dragon fruit, especially focussing on the biosynthesis and characteristic of betalains and the mechanisms of self-incompatibility. A theoretical reference is provided for a comprehensive understanding of the genetic basis of important agronomic traits in dragon fruit and the development of new varieties.
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Korotkova N, Borsch T, Arias S. 2017. A phylogenetic framework for the Hylocereeae (Cactaceae) and implications for the circumscription of the genera. Phytotaxa 327(1):1−46

    doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.327.1.1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Shah K, Chen J, Chen J, Qin Y. 2023. Pitaya nutrition, biology, and biotechnology: a review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24:13986

    doi: 10.3390/ijms241813986

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Yu YB. 2012. Research progress and development of pitaya flower. Journal of Tropical Organisms

    [4]

    Sun P, Cheng Z, Sun C, Guo S, Guo G, et al. 2020. Floral organogenesis of red pitaya (Hylocereus monacanthus). Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 35(9):943−49

    doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2020.09.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Hua Q, Chen C, Tel Zur N, Wang H, Wu J, et al. 2018. Metabolomic characterization of pitaya fruit from three red-skinned cultivars with different pulp colors. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 126:117−25

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.02.027

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Liaotrakoon W, Van Buggenhout S, Christiaens S, Houben K, De Clercq N, et al. 2013. An explorative study on the cell wall polysaccharides in the pulp and peel of dragon fruits (Hylocereus spp. ). European Food Research and Technology 237:341−51

    doi: 10.1007/s00217-013-1997-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Lim HK, Tan CP, Karim R, Ariffin AA, Bakar J. 2010. Chemical composition and DSC thermal properties of two species of Hylocereus cacti seed oil: Hylocereus undatus and Hylocereus polyrhizus. Food Chemistry 119:1326−31

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.09.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    García-Cruz L, Valle-Guadarrama S, Salinas-Moreno Y, Joaquín-Cruz E. 2013. Physical, Chemical, and Antioxidant Activity Characterization of Pitaya (Stenocereus pruinosus) Fruits. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 68:403−10

    doi: 10.1007/s11130-013-0391-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Hsieh CL, Huang SM, Chen LI, Yu CM, Wong CH, et al. 2016. Novel approach of using nutraceutic-directed caloric antioxidant density and ion-ratio for evaluating fruit's health quality. Journal of Food Science 81:H2059−H2068

    doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.13390

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Villalobos-Gutiérrez MG, Schweiggert RM, Carle R, Esquivel P. 2012. Chemical characterization of Central American pitaya (Hylocereus sp.) seeds and seed oil. CyTA - Journal of Food 10:78−83

    doi: 10.1080/19476337.2011.580063

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Tenore GC, Novellino E, Basile A. 2012. Nutraceutical potential and antioxidant benefits of red pitaya (Hylocereus polyrhizus) extracts. Journal of Functional Foods 4:129−36

    doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2011.09.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    García-Cruz L, Dueñas M, Santos-Buelgas C, Valle-Guadarrama S, Salinas-Moreno Y. 2017. Betalains and phenolic compounds profiling and antioxidant capacity of pitaya (Stenocereus spp.) fruit from two species (S. Pruinosus and S. stellatus). Food Chemestry 234:111−18

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.04.174

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Tel-Zur N, Mizrahi Y, Cisneros A, Mouyal J, Schneider B, et al. 2011. Phenotypic and genomic characterization of vine cactus collection (Cactaceae). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 58:1075−85

    doi: 10.1007/s10722-010-9643-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Otálora MC, Wilches-Torres A, Gómez Castaño JA. 2023. Mucilage from yellow pitahaya (Selenicereus megalanthus) fruit peel: extraction, proximal analysis, and molecular characterization. Molecules 28:786

    doi: 10.3390/molecules28020786

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Chen JY, Xie FF, Cui YZ, Chen CB, Lu WJ, et al. 2021. A chromosome-scale genome sequence of pitaya (Hylocereus undatus) provides novel insights into the genome evolution and regulation of betalain biosynthesis. Horticulture Research 8:164

    doi: 10.1038/s41438-021-00612-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Zheng J, Meinhardt LW, Goenaga R, Zhang D, Yin Y. 2021. The chromosome-level genome of dragon fruit reveals whole-genome duplication and chromosomal co-localization of betacyanin biosynthetic genes. Horticulture Research 8:63

    doi: 10.1038/s41438-021-00501-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Mou Z, Zeng R, Chen N, Liu Z, Zeng Z, et al. 2022. The association of HpDof1.7 and HpDof5.4 with soluble sugar accumulation in pitaya fruit by transcriptionally activating sugar metabolic genes. Food Quality and Safety 6:fyac042

    doi: 10.1093/fqsafe/fyac042

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Chen JY, Xie FF, Shah K, Chen CB, Zeng JM, et al. 2023. Identification of HubHLH family and key role of HubHLH159 in betalain biosynthesis by activating the transcription of HuADH1, HuCYP76AD1-1, and HuDODA1 in pitaya. Plant Science 328:111595

    doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2023.111595

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Wang Z, Wang M, Ding Y, Li T, Jiang S, et al. 2023. The pitaya flower tissue's gene differential expression analysis between self-incompatible and self-compatible varieties for the identification of genes involved in self-incompatibility regulation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24:11406

    doi: 10.3390/ijms241411406

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Koes R, Verweij W, Quattrocchio F. 2005. Flavonoids: a colorful model for the regulation and evolution of biochemical pathways. Trends in Plant Science 10:236−42

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2005.03.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Tanaka Y, Sasaki N, Ohmiya A. 2008. Biosynthesis of plant pigments: anthocyanins, betalains and carotenoids. The Plant Journal 54:733−49

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03447.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Gandía-Herrero F, García-Carmona F. 2019. The dawn of betalains. New Phytologist 227:664−66

    doi: 10.1111/nph.16295

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Xie F, Hua Q, Chen C, Zhang Z, Zhang R, et al. 2021. Genome-wide characterization of R2R3-MYB transcription factors in pitaya reveals a R2R3-MYB repressor HuMYB1 involved in fruit ripening through regulation of betalain biosynthesis by repressing betalain biosynthesis-related genes. Cells 10:1949

    doi: 10.3390/cells10081949

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Jiang H, Zhang W, Li X, Shu C, Jiang W, et al. 2021. Nutrition, phytochemical profile, bioactivities and applications in food industry of pitaya (Hylocereus spp.) peels: a comprehensive review. Trends in Food Science & Technology 116:199−217

    doi: 10.1016/j.jpgs.2021.06.040

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Rahimi P, Abedimanesh S, Mesbah-Namin SA, Ostadrahimi A. 2019. Betalains, the nature-inspired pigments, in health and diseases. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 59:2949−78

    doi: 10.1080/10408398.2018.1479830

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Weiss V, Okun Z, Shpigelman A. 2023. Utilization of hydrocolloids for the stabilization of pigments from natural sources. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science 68:101756

    doi: 10.1016/j.cocis.2023.101756

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Rodriguez-Amaya DB. 2019. Update on natural food pigments - A mini-review on carotenoids, anthocyanins, and betalains. Food Research International 124:200−05

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.05.028

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Sawicki T, Martinez-Villaluenga C, Frias J, Wiczkowski W, Peñas E, et al. 2019. The effect of processing and in vitro digestion on the betalain profile and ACE inhibition activity of red beetroot products. Journal of Functional Foods 55:229−37

    doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2019.01.053

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Jackman RL, Smith JL. 1996. Anthocyanins and betalains. In Natural Food Colorants, eds. Hendry GAF, Houghton JD. Boston, MA: Springer. pp. 244−309. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-2155-6_8

    [30]

    Rodrigues C, Souza VGL, Coelhoso I, Fernando AL. 2021. Bio-based sensors for smart food packaging—current applications and future trends. Sensors 21:2148

    doi: 10.3390/s21062148

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Wybraniec S, Stalica P, Jerz G, Klose B, Gebers N, et al. 2009. Separation of polar betalain pigments from cacti fruits of Hylocereus polyrhizus by ion-pair high-speed countercurrent chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A 1216:6890−99

    doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.08.035

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Stintzing FC, Conrad J, Klaiber I, Beifuss U, Carle R. 2004. Structural investigations on betacyanin pigments by LC NMR and 2D NMR spectroscopy. Phytochemistry 65:415−22

    doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2003.10.029

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Otalora C, Bonifazi E, Fissore E, Basanta F, Gerschenson L. 2020. Thermal stability of betalains in by-products of the blanching and cutting of Beta vulgaris L. var conditiva. Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences 70:15−24

    doi: 10.31883/pjfns/116415

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Muramatsu D, Muramatsu D, Uchiyama H, Higashi H, Kida H, et al. 2023. Effects of heat degradation of betanin in red beetroot (Beta vulgaris L.) on biological activity and antioxidant capacity. PLoS One 18:e0286255

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286255

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Chhikara N, Kushwaha K, Sharma P, Gat Y, Panghal A. 2019. Bioactive compounds of beetroot and utilization in food processing industry: A critical review. Food Chemistry 272:192−200

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.08.022

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Reynoso R, Garcia FA, Morales D, Gonzalez de Mejia E. 1997. Stability of betalain pigments from a Cactacea fruit. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 45:2884−89

    doi: 10.1021/jf960804r

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Czapski J. 1990. Heat stability of betacyanins in red beet juice and in betanin solutions. Zeitschrift für Lebensmittel-Untersuchung und Forschung 191:275−78

    doi: 10.1007/BF01202425

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Khan MI, Giridhar P. 2014. Enhanced chemical stability, chromatic properties and regeneration of betalains in Rivina humilis L. berry juice. LWT - Food Science and Technology 58:649−57

    doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2014.03.027

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Gandía-Herrero F, Escribano J, García-Carmona F. 2010. Structural implications on color, fluorescence, and antiradical activity in betalains. Planta 232:449−60

    doi: 10.1007/s00425-010-1191-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Khan MI. 2016. Stabilization of betalains: A review. Food Chemistry 197:1280−85

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.11.043

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Stintzing FC, Carle R. 2004. Functional properties of anthocyanins and betalains in plants, food, and in human nutrition. Trends in Food Science & Technology 15:19−38

    doi: 10.1016/j.jpgs.2003.07.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Kobayashi N, Schmidt J, Wray V, Schliemann W. 2001. Formation and occurrence of dopamine-derived betacyanins. Phytochemistry 56:429−36

    doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)00383-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Sadowska-Bartosz I, Bartosz G. 2021. Biological Properties and Applications of Betalains. Molecules 26:2520

    doi: 10.3390/molecules26092520

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Huang AS, Von Elbe JH. 1987. Effect of pH on the degradation and regeneration of betanine. Journal of Food Science 52:1689−93

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1987.tb05907.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    von Elbe JH, Maing IY, Amundson CH. 1974. Color stability of betanin. Journal of Food Science 39:334−37

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1974.tb02888.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Gill M. 1994. Pigments of fungi (macromycetes). Natural Product Reports 11:67−90

    doi: 10.1039/np9941100067

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Brockington SF, Walker RH, Glover BJ, Soltis PS, Soltis DE. 2011. Complex pigment evolution in the Caryophyllales. New Phytologist 190:854−64

    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03687.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    Contreras-Llano LE, Guerrero-Rubio MA, Lozada-Ramírez JD, García-Carmona F, Gandía-Herrero F, et al. 2019. First betalain-producing bacteria break the exclusive presence of the pigments in the plant kingdom. mBio 10:e00345−19

    doi: 10.1128/mBio.00345-19

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Kugler F, Stintzing FC, Carle R. 2004. Identification of betalains from petioles of differently colored Swiss chard (Beta vulgaris L. ssp. cicla [L.] Alef. Cv. Bright Lights) by high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 52:2975−81

    doi: 10.1021/jf035491w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Chang YC, Chiu YC, Tsao NW, Chou YL, Tan CM, et al. 2021. Elucidation of the core betalain biosynthesis pathway in Amaranthus tricolor. Scientific Reports 11:6086

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85486-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    Kumar SS, Manoj P, Nimisha G, Giridhar P. 2016. Phytoconstituents and stability of betalains in fruit extracts of Malabar spinach (Basella rubra L.). Journal of Food Science and Technology 53:4014−22

    doi: 10.1007/s13197-016-2404-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Polturak G, Heinig U, Grossman N, Battat M, Leshkowitz D, et al. 2018. Transcriptome and metabolic profiling provides insights into betalain biosynthesis and evolution in Mirabilis jalapa. Molecular Plant 11:189−204

    doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.12.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Timoneda A, Feng T, Sheehan H, Walker-Hale N, Pucker B, et al. 2019. The evolution of betalain biosynthesis in Caryophyllales. New Phytologist 224:71−85

    doi: 10.1111/nph.15980

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    Pucker B, Walker-Hale N, Dzurlic J, Yim WC, Cushman JC, et al. 2023. Multiple mechanisms explain loss of anthocyanins from betalain-pigmented Caryophyllales, including repeated wholesale loss of a key anthocyanidin synthesis enzyme. New Phytologist 241:471−89

    doi: 10.1111/nph.19341

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    Shimada S, Inoue YT, Sakuta M. 2005. Anthocyanidin synthase in non-anthocyanin-producing Caryophyllales species. The Plant Journal 44:950−59

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02574.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56]

    Clement JS, Mabry TJ. 1996. Pigment evolution in the Caryophyllales: a systematic overview*. Botanica Acta 109:360−67

    doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.1996.tb00584.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57]

    Brockington SF, Yang Y, Gandia-Herrero F, Covshoff S, Hibberd JM, et al. 2015. Lineage-specific gene radiations underlie the evolution of novel betalain pigmentation in Caryophyllales. New Phytologist 207:1170−80

    doi: 10.1111/nph.13441

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58]

    Eichenberger M, Schwander T, Hüppi S, Kreuzer J, Mittl PRE, et al. 2023. The catalytic role of glutathione transferases in heterologous anthocyanin biosynthesis. Nature Catalysis 6:927−38

    doi: 10.1038/s41929-023-01018-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59]

    Grotewold E, Sainz MB, Tagliani L, Hernandez JM, Bowen B, et al. 2000. Identification of the residues in the Myb domain of maize C1 that specify the interaction with the bHLH cofactor R. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97:13579−84

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.250379897

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60]

    Zimmermann IM, Heim MA, Weisshaar B, Uhrig JF. 2004. Comprehensive identification of Arabidopsis thaliana MYB transcription factors interacting with R/B-like BHLH proteins. The Plant Journal 40:22−34

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02183.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61]

    Hatlestad GJ, Akhavan NA, Sunnadeniya RM, Elam L, Cargile S, et al. 2015. The beet Y locus encodes an anthocyanin MYB-like protein that activates the betalain red pigment pathway. Nature Genetics 47:92−96

    doi: 10.1038/ng.3163

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62]

    Gandía-Herrero F, García-Carmona F. 2013. Biosynthesis of betalains: yellow and violet plant pigments. Trends in Plant Science 18:334−43

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.01.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63]

    Wink M. 1997. Compartmentation of secondary metabolites and xenobiotics in plant vacuoles. Advances in Botanical Research 25:141−69

    doi: 10.1016/s0065-2296(08)60151-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64]

    Polturak G, Aharoni A. 2018. "La Vie en Rose": Biosynthesis, sources, and applications of betalain pigments. Molecular Plant 11:7−22

    doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.10.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65]

    Guerrero-Rubio MA, Escribano J, Garcia-Carmona F, Gandia-Herrero F. 2020. Light emission in betalains: from fluorescent flowers to biotechnological applications. Trends in Plant Science 25:159−75

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2019.11.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66]

    Mueller LA, Hinz U, Uzé M, Sautter C, Zryd JP. 1997. Biochemical complementation of the betalain biosynthetic pathway in Portulaca grandiflora by a fungal 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine dioxygenase. Planta 203:260−63

    doi: 10.1007/s004250050190

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67]

    Sasaki N, Abe Y, Goda Y, Adachi T, Kasahara K, Ozeki Y. 2009. Detection of DOPA 4, 5-dioxygenase (DOD) activity using recombinant protein prepared from Escherichia coli cells harboring cDNA encoding DOD from Mirabilis jalapa. Plant and Cell Physiology 50:1012−16

    doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcp053

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68]

    Nishihara M, Hirabuchi A, Goto F, Nishizaki Y, Uesugi S, et al. 2023. Production of yellow-flowered gentian plants by genetic engineering of betaxanthin pigments. New Phytologist 240:1177−88

    doi: 10.1111/nph.19218

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69]

    Kugler F, Stintzing FC, Carle R. 2007. Characterisation of betalain patterns of differently coloured inflorescences from Gomphrena globosa L. and Bougainvillea sp. by HPLC-DAD-ESI-MSn. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 387:637−48

    doi: 10.1007/s00216-006-0897-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70]

    Jarvis DE, Ho YS, Lightfoot DJ, Schmöckel SM, Li B, et al. 2017. The genome of Chenopodium quinoa. Nature 542:307−12

    doi: 10.1038/nature21370

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71]

    Sutor K, Wybraniec S. 2020. Identification and determination of betacyanins in fruit extracts of melocactus species. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 68:11459−67

    doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c04746

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72]

    Kumorkiewicz-Jamro A, Świergosz T, Sutor K, Spórna-Kucab A, Wybraniec S. 2021. Multi-colored shades of betalains: recent advances in betacyanin chemistry. Natural Product Reports 38:2315−46

    doi: 10.1039/D1NP00018G

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73]

    Khan MI, Giridhar P. 2015. Plant betalains: chemistry and biochemistry. Phytochemistry 117:267−95

    doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2015.06.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74]

    Cai Y, Sun M, Corke H. 2001. Identification and distribution of simple and acylated betacyanins in the Amaranthaceae. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 49:1971−78

    doi: 10.1021/jf000963h

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75]

    Lystvan K, Kumorkiewicz A, Szneler E, Wybraniec S. 2018. Study on betalains in Celosia cristata Linn. callus culture and identification of new malonylated amaranthins. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 66:3870−79

    doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b01014

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76]

    Spórna-Kucab A, Kumorkiewicz A, Szmyr N, Szneler E, Wybraniec S. 2019. Separation of betacyanins from flowers of Amaranthus cruentus L. in a polar solvent system by high-speed counter-current chromatography. Journal of Separation Science 42:1676−85

    doi: 10.1002/jssc.201801172

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77]

    Gandía-Herrero F, Cabanes J, Escribano J, García-Carmona F, Jiménez-Atiénzar M. 2013. Encapsulation of the most potent antioxidant betalains in edible matrixes as powders of different colors. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 61:4294−302

    doi: 10.1021/jf400337g

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78]

    Hua Q, Chen C, Chen Z, Chen P, Ma Y, et al. 2015. Transcriptomic analysis reveals key genes related to betalain biosynthesis in pulp coloration of Hylocereus polyrhizus. Frontiers in Plant Science 6:1179

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01179

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79]

    Lopez-Nieves S, Yang Y, Timoneda A, Wang M, Feng T, et al. 2018. Relaxation of tyrosine pathway regulation underlies the evolution of betalain pigmentation in Caryophyllales. New Phytologist 217:896−908

    doi: 10.1111/nph.14822

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80]

    Steglich W, Strack D. 1990. Betalains. In The Alkaloids: Chemistry and Pharmacology, ed. Brossi A. Vol. 39. USA: Academic Press. pp. 1−62. doi: 10.1016/s0099-9598(08)60163-7

    [81]

    Harris NN, Javellana J, Davies KM, Lewis DH, Jameson PE, et al. 2012. Betalain production is possible in anthocyanin-producing plant species given the presence of DOPA-dioxygenase and L-DOPA. BMC Plant Biology 12:34

    doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-12-34

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82]

    Hua Q, Chen C, Xie F, Zhang Z, Zhang R, et al. 2021. A genome-wide identification study reveals that HmoCYP76AD1, HmoDODAα1 and HmocDOPA5GT involved in betalain biosynthesis in Hylocereus. Genes 12:1858

    doi: 10.3390/genes12121858

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83]

    Carreón-Hidalgo JP, Franco-Vásquez DC, Gómez-Linton DR, Pérez-Flores LJ. 2022. Betalain plant sources, biosynthesis, extraction, stability enhancement methods, bioactivity, and applications. Food Research International 151:110821

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110821

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84]

    Wybraniec S. 2005. Formation of Decarboxylated betacyanins in heated purified betacyanin fractions from red beet root (Beta vulgaris L.) monitored by LC−MS/MS. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 53:3483−87

    doi: 10.1021/jf048088d

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85]

    Wybraniec S, Mizrahi Y. 2005. Generation of decarboxylated and dehydrogenated betacyanins in thermally treated purified fruit extract from purple pitaya (Hylocereus polyrhizus) monitored by LC-MS/MS. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 53:6704−12

    doi: 10.1021/jf050700t

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86]

    Cheng MN, Huang ZJ, Hua QZ, Shan W, Kuang JF, et al. 2017. The WRKY transcription factor HpWRKY44 regulates CytP450-like1 expression in red pitaya fruit (Hylocereus polyrhizus). Horticulture Research 4:17039

    doi: 10.1038/hortres.2017.39

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87]

    Xu M, Liu CL, Fu Y, Liao ZW, Guo PY, et al. 2020. Molecular characterization and expression analysis of pitaya (Hylocereus polyrhizus) HpLRR genes in response to Neoscytalidium dimidiatum infection. BMC Plant Biology 20:160

    doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02368-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88]

    Zhang L, Chen C, Xie F, Hua Q, Zhang Z, et al. 2021. A novel WRKY transcription factor HmoWRKY40 associated with betalain biosynthesis in pitaya (Hylocereus monacanthus) through regulating HmoCYP76AD1. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22:2171

    doi: 10.3390/ijms22042171

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89]

    Zhang Y, Xu Y, Huang D, Xing W, Wu B, et al. 2022. Research progress on the MYB transcription factors in tropical fruit. Tropical Plants 1:5

    doi: 10.48130/tp-2022-0005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90]

    McClure B, Cruz-García F, Romero C. 2011. Compatibility and incompatibility in S-RNase-based systems. Annals of Botany 108:647−58

    doi: 10.1093/aob/mcr179

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91]

    Igic B, Lande R, Kohn Joshua R. 2008. Loss of self-incompatibility and its evolutionary consequences. International Journal of Plant Sciences 169:93−104

    doi: 10.1086/523362

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92]

    Fujii S, Kubo KI, Takayama S. 2016. Non-self- and self-recognition models in plant self-incompatibility. Nature Plants 2:16130

    doi: 10.1038/nplants.2016.130

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93]

    Cocker JM, Wright J, Li J, Swarbreck D, Dyer S, et al. 2018. Primula vulgaris (primrose) genome assembly, annotation and gene expression, with comparative genomics on the heterostyly supergene. Scientific Reports 8:17942

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36304-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [94]

    Hiscock SJ, McInnis SM. 2003. Pollen recognition and rejection during the sporophytic self-incompatibility response: Brassica and beyond. Trends in Plant Science 8:606−13

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2003.10.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [95]

    Nasrallah JB. 2019. Self-incompatibility in the Brassicaceae: Regulation and mechanism of self-recognition. In Plant Development and Evolution, ed. Grossniklaus U. UK: Academic Press. pp. 435−52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.ctdb.2018.10.002

    [96]

    Hiscock SJ, Tabah DA. 2003. The different mechanisms of sporophytic self-incompatibility. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 358:1037−45

    doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1297

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [97]

    Puerta AR, Ushijima K, Koba T, Sassa H. 2009. Identification and functional analysis of pistil self-incompatibility factor HT-B of Petunia. Journal of Experimental Botany 60:1309−18

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [98]

    Bilinski P, Kohn J. 2012. Sites of self-pollen tube inhibition in Papaveraceae (sensu lato). Plant Systematics and Evolution 298:1239−47

    doi: 10.1007/s00606-012-0630-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [99]

    De Franceschi P, Dondini L, Sanzol J. 2012. Molecular bases and evolutionary dynamics of self-incompatibility in the Pyrinae (Rosaceae). Journal of Experimental Botany 63:4015−32

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers108

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [100]

    Liang M, Cao Z, Zhu A, Liu Y, Tao M, et al. 2020. Evolution of self-compatibility by a mutant Sm-RNase in citrus. Nature Plants 6:131−42

    doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-0597-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [101]

    Niu SC, Huang J, Zhang YQ, Li PX, Zhang GQ, et al. 2017. Lack of S-RNase-based gametophytic self-incompatibility in orchids suggests that this system evolved after the monocot-eudicot split. Frontiers in Plant Science 8:1106

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01106

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [102]

    Lv S, Qiao X, Zhang W, Li Q, Wang P, et al. 2022. The origin and evolution of RNase T2 family and gametophytic self-incompatibility system in plants. Genome Biology and Evolution 14:evac093

    doi: 10.1093/gbe/evac093

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [103]

    Zhang D, Li YY, Zhao X, Zhang C, Liu DK, et al. 2024. Molecular insights into self-incompatibility systems: From evolution to breeding. Plant Communications 5:100719

    doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2023.100719

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [104]

    Bentov I, Lee C, Mizrahi A, Rosenfeld M. 2014. Proof of activity: extending bitcoin's proof of work via proof of stake. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review 42:34−37

    doi: 10.1145/2695533.2695545

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [105]

    Qu H, Guan Y, Wang Y, Zhang S. 2017. PLC-mediated signaling pathway in pollen tubes regulates the gametophytic self-incompatibility of Pyrus species. Frontiers in Plant Science 8:1164

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01164

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [106]

    Del Ángel-Pérez AL, Nataren-Velázquez J, Megchun Garcia JV, Villagómez-del-Ángel TE, Ayala-Garay AV. 2022. Flowering in Hylocereus spp.: comparative analysis and self-incompatibility. Agro Productividad 15(8):2259

    doi: 10.32854/agrop.v15i8.2259

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [107]

    Lichtenzveig J, Abbo S, Nerd A, Tel-Zur N, Mizrahi Y. 2000. Cytology and mating systems in the climbing cacti Hylocereus and Selenicereus. American Journal of Botany 87:1058−65

    doi: 10.2307/2657005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [108]

    Renfiyeni R. 2018. The effect of pollination models on yield of red pitaya (Hylocereus polyrhizus). JERAMI Indonesian Journal of Crop Science 1:19−24

    doi: 10.25077/jijcs.1.1.19-24.2018

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [109]

    Chen J, Yuan Y, Xie F, Zhang Z, Chen J, et al. 2022. Metabolic profiling of organic acids reveals the involvement of HuIPMS2 in citramalic acid synthesis in pitaya. Horticulturae 8:167

    doi: 10.3390/horticulturae8020167

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [110]

    Hua Q, Zhou Q, Gan S, Wu J, Chen C, et al. 2016. Proteomic analysis of Hylocereus polyrhizus reveals metabolic pathway changes. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 17:1606

    doi: 10.3390/ijms17101606

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [111]

    Li X, Li B, Guan S, Cai L, Pang X. 2021. Hub genes and sub-networks of stoma-related genes in Hylocereus undatus through trypsin treatment during storage revealed by transcriptomic analysis. Journal of Food Biochemistry 45:e13538

    doi: 10.1111/jfbc.13538

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [112]

    Li X, Li B, Gu S, Pang X, Mason P, et al. 2024. Single-cell and spatial RNA sequencing reveal the spatiotemporal trajectories of fruit senescence. Nature Communications 15:3108

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-47329-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [113]

    Pang X, Sun J, Jia J, Trusov Y, Chandora R, et al. 2024. Integration of single-cell and spatial RNA sequencing uncovers spatiotemporal transition of fruit senescence trajectory from exocarp to mesocarp in Pitaya (Hylocereus undatus). Postharvest Biology and Technology 213:112954

    doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2024.112954

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [114]

    Xiong R, Liu C, Xu M, Wei SS, Huang JQ, et al. 2020. Transcriptomic analysis of flower induction for long-day pitaya by supplementary lighting in short-day winter season. BMC Genomics 21:329

    doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-6726-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [115]

    Wu Y, Xu J, Han X, Qiao G, Yang K, et al. 2020. Comparative transcriptome analysis combining SMRT- and Illumina-based RNA-Seq identifies potential candidate genes involved in betalain biosynthesis in pitaya fruit. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21:3288

    doi: 10.3390/ijms21093288

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [116]

    Nong Q, Zhang M, Chen J, Zhang M, Cheng H, et al. 2019. RNA-Seq de novo assembly of red pitaya (Hylocereus polyrhizus) roots and differential transcriptome analysis in response to salt stress. Tropical Plant Biology 12:55−66

    doi: 10.1007/s12042-019-09217-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [117]

    Li X, Li B, Min D, Ji N, Zhang X, et al. 2021. Transcriptomic analysis reveals key genes associated with the biosynthesis regulation of phenolics in fresh-cut pitaya fruit (Hylocereus undatus). Postharvest Biology and Technology 181:111684

    doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2021.111684

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [118]

    Xu M, Liu CL, Luo J, Qi Z, Yan Z, et al. 2019. Transcriptomic de novo analysis of pitaya (Hylocereus polyrhizus) canker disease caused by Neoscytalidium dimidiatum. BMC Genomics 20:10

    doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-5343-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [119]

    Zhang HB. 2024. Gene-based Breeding (GBB), a novel discipline of biological science and technology for plant and animal breeding. Tropical Plants 3:e005

    doi: 10.48130/tp-0024-0005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [120]

    Zhu Z, Johnson J, Zaman QU, Wang H. 2022. Challenges and opportunities to improve tropical fruits in Hainan, China. Tropical Plants 1:13

    doi: 10.48130/tp-2022-0013

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Li P, Ma X, Li Z, Yao H, Lu G, et al. 2024. A review on the advances of dragon fruit. Tropical Plants 3: e041 doi: 10.48130/tp-0024-0041
    Li P, Ma X, Li Z, Yao H, Lu G, et al. 2024. A review on the advances of dragon fruit. Tropical Plants 3: e041 doi: 10.48130/tp-0024-0041

Figures(3)  /  Tables(1)

Article Metrics

Article views(824) PDF downloads(445)

REVIEW   Open Access    

A review on the advances of dragon fruit

Tropical Plants  3 Article number: e041  (2024)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Over ten years of rapid development, dragon fruit has become China's fifth major South Asian subtropical horticultural fruit, following lychee, longan, banana, and mango. As a climbing cactus, dragon fruit possesses lots of unique biological characteristics, such as blooming at night, being rich in betalains substances, and self-incompatibility. In recent years, with the publication of dragon fruit genomes, the molecular basis of forming dragon fruit's biological characteristics has been extensively studied and explored. This review gives a glimpse into the research progress on biological characteristics, germplasm resource classification, and genome sequencing of dragon fruit, especially focussing on the biosynthesis and characteristic of betalains and the mechanisms of self-incompatibility. A theoretical reference is provided for a comprehensive understanding of the genetic basis of important agronomic traits in dragon fruit and the development of new varieties.

    • Dragon fruit is a perennial climbing vine from the Selenicereus genus of the Cactaceae family, which originated in Mexico and Central America[1]. The relatively mature large-scale planting techniques and the early high returns on investment have prompted the rapid development of China's dragon fruit industry. The planting area expanded from 2,000 in 2010 to 70,000 hm2 in 2021, and the output increased from 36,000 tons in 2010 to 1,600,000 tons in 2021. China now ranks first in the world in both planting area and output of dragon fruit, with an annual output value exceeding 10 billion RMB. The proportion of dragon fruit in tropical fruit production also rose from 0.15% in 2010 to 5.3% in 2020, making it the fifth major South Asian subtropical horticultural fruit after lychee, longan, banana, and mango in China.

      The rapid expansion of planting areas has exposed many problems, such as a limited number of varieties, few cold-resistant and pest-resistant varieties, a lack of deep-processed products, and insufficient development of high-value-added products, which severely restrict the healthy and sustainable development of the dragon fruit industry. Therefore, based on the existing domestic dragon fruit germplasm resources, conducting in-depth research on dragon fruit genomics, population genetics and functional genomics are of great significance for developing modern breeding techniques and accelerating the cultivation of new dragon fruit varieties. This review elaborates on the recent research progress of dragon fruit in terms of germplasm resources, genomics, and biological characteristics, hoping to provide some references for subsequent research and breeding of dragon fruit.

    • Dragon fruit is world-renowned for its large, night-blooming flowers, known as the 'Moonlight Cactus', and also commonly referred to as the 'Overlord Flower' by the Chinese. The dragon fruit flower is a typical nocturnal flower that blooms for only one night and wilts the next day. The flower is not only large and beautiful but also edible, with high nutritional value[2]. The stamens and pistils of the dragon fruit flower are of equal or shorter length, and under natural conditions, the dragon fruit exhibits a certain degree of self-incompatibility, leading to a low self-pollination rate[3,4].

      Dragon fruit originates from tropical rainforests and prefers to grow in warm, humid, and well-lit environments, climbing on tree trunks or rocks with an optimal growth temperature of 25−35 °C. As a species from the cactus family, dragon fruit exhibits high tolerance to heat, drought, and shade, being light-loving and thriving in both fertile and poor soils[5]. Commercially grown dragon fruits often have triangular fleshy stems, which are the main sites for photosynthesis. The leaves are modified into short spines located in the notches along the wavy edges of the stems.

      Dragon fruit typically has a vibrant red or yellow peel and white, red, or violet-red flesh, which are mainly derived from a natural pigment called betalains. As a low-calorie and low-fat fruit, the main sugar component in dragon fruit flesh is glucose[6], it is also rich in dietary fiber, vitamins, various minerals, and high levels of plant albumins and amino acids[79]. The fruit is densely packed with numerous black seeds containing unsaturated fatty acids such as linoleic acid, linolenic acid, palmitoleic acid, arachidic acid, and stearic acid[10]. Besides being edible, the flower, fruit, and stem of the dragon fruit can be used medicinally, exhibiting biological activities such as antiproliferative, antimicrobial[11], lipid-lowering, and antioxidant properties[12], and significant anticancer and hypertension-preventive effects, demonstrating great medicinal potential[11].

    • The systematic nomenclature of dragon fruit was once very chaotic, with the same species having different species names. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the common species names of dragon fruit. Originally, dragon fruit were considered belonging to two genera, Hylocereus and Selenicereus. In 2017, molecular phylogenetic studies showed that the species of the former Hylocereus were nested within the species of Selenicereus, thus merging the two genera into one, now known as Selenicereus[1]. After the merger, Selenicereus contains a total of 33 species (https://wfoplantlist.org), with the four most common species used for large-scale commercial cultivation being S. undatus (formerly H. undatus) with red peel and white flesh (Fig. 1a), S. costaricensis (formerly H. costaricensis) with dark magenta peel, and violet-red flesh (Fig. 1b), S. monacanthus (formerly H. monacanthus, also known as H. polyrhizus) with crimson peel and flesh (Fig. 1c), and S. megalanthus (H. megalanthus and S. megalanthus are used interchangeably, now classified as the same species) with yellow peel and white flesh
      (Fig. 1d)[1,13,14]. Other varieties, such as the thornless yellow dragon fruit, known abroad as Aussie Gold, have yellow peel (scaly, smooth, and thornless) and white flesh, but they do not belong to S. megalanthus and are more like a mutant variety of S. undatus. Dragon fruit varieties that have pink flesh, or bicolor varieties are usually the hybrids of S. undatus and S. costaricensis.

      Figure 1. 

      The phenotype of bud, flower and fruit of four main commercial dragon fruits. (a) S. undatus has green buds; big, funnel-shaped, and white nocturnal flowers; and oblong fruits with pink peel, and white flesh and covered with green, long, and hard scales. (b) S. costaricensis has green buds along with lighter red edges on the outer perianth; big, funnel-shaped and white nocturnal flowers; and ovoid fruit with dark magenta peel and violet-red flesh, and covered with red, soft and short scales. (c) S. monacanthus has green buds along with bright red edges on the outer perianth; big funnel-shaped and white nocturnal flowers; and ovoid fruit with crimson peel and flesh covered with red, soft and short scales. (d) S. megalanthus has green buds along with dark brown outer perianth; big funnel-shaped (rounder than other species) and white (a little yellow) nocturnal flowers; and ovoid fruit with yellow peel and white (transparent) flesh covered with thorns on tuberculate skin instead of scales.

      In China, the most widely cultivated varieties are red-flesh series, including 'Ruanzhidahong', 'Jindu 1', 'Guanhuahong' and 'Guihonglong 1', all of which belong to the species of S. costaricensis. On the other hand, white flesh cultivators like 'Vietnam 1' are introduced from Vietnam and belong to S. undatus, while 'Guanhuabai' and 'Baishuijing' are locally developed new varieties from S. undatus. Unlike earlier cultivated varieties, most commercially used varieties in recent years are self-compatible, which helps reduce labor costs. However, the genetic background of the most collected dragon fruit germplasms remains unknown. Therefore, to promote the breeding of new dragon fruit varieties, it is necessary to conduct detailed and in-depth research on the genetic background and phylogenetic relationships of dragon fruit germplasm resources.

    • The plant genome is the foundation for studying plant gene functions, population genetics, species evolution, and molecular breeding. Thus, the high-quality genome is the key to understanding the mechanisms behind various biological characteristics of plants. In 2021, two reference genomes of S. undatus were published, laying the foundation for in-depth research on dragon fruit[15,16]. The chromosomal-level genome of 'Guanhuabai' ('GHB') dragon fruit (2n = 2x = 22 chromosomes) was assembled using Pacbio, Hi-C, and 10× Genomics sequencing technologies, resulting in a 1.41 Gb genome with scaffold N50 of approximately 127.15 Mb[15]. A total of 27,753 protein-coding genes and 896.31 Mb of repetitive sequences were annotated. The study confirmed that dragon fruit suffered a whole-genome triplication event and a whole-genome duplication event, and inferred that dragon fruit diverged from the Caryophyllales order about 65.3 million years ago (MYA). Additionally, Chen et al. constructed a high-density genetic map based on the 'GHB' × Dahong F1 hybrid population and genetic maps for both parents, screening and identifying numerous SNP loci, providing essential data for subsequent dragon fruit breeding[15]. Based on the 'GHB' dragon fruit genome, Mou et al. discovered that the transcription factors HpDof1.7 and HpDof5.4 can bind to the promoters of HpSuSy1, HpINV2, HpTMT2, and HpSWEET14 to increase their activity, thereby enhancing the expression of the sugar metabolism pathway genes at the transcriptional level and promoting sugar accumulation in dragon fruit[17]. Chen et al. also found that the transcription factor HubHLH159 promotes betacyanin biosynthesis by activating the expression of HuADH1, HuYP76AD1-1, and HuDODA1[18]. Furthermore, Wang et al. preliminarily identified that HuS-RNase2, involved in post-pollination ubiquitination regulation is a candidate female development S-gene in the gametophytic self-incompatibility (GSI) system of dragon fruit[19].

      Another version of the S. undatus genome (variety 'David Bowie') assembled a 1.33 Gb dragon fruit genome, with a scaffold N50 of approximately 109.7 Mb, but a contig N50 of only 31 Kb, and predicted 28,992 protein-coding genes[16]. This study estimated that dragon fruit diverged from the giant cereus around 9.18 MYA. They also found that genes related to betacyanin biosynthesis were co-located in a 12 Mb region on one chromosome, and speculated that this may enhance the efficiency of betacyanin synthesis.

      Overall, the publication of these two genomes represents a breakthrough in the dragon fruit genome, providing crucial information for a better understanding of the biological characteristics and evolutionary history of dragon fruit, but the integrity of the assembled genomes is low. The genome of the main cultivated violet-red flesh dragon fruit (S. costaricensis) was not studied. Additionally, large-scale studies on population genomics, 3D genomics, and epigenomics, extensively conducted in other plants, have not yet been reported in dragon fruit. Thus, more comprehensive and in-depth studies research on dragon fruit genomics is necessary and urgent.

    • Plant pigments are a type of secondary metabolite produced during life activities, not only giving the plants brilliant flowers and vibrant fruits, but also participating in crucial biological processes such as plant growth and development, photosynthesis, and the maintenance of biodiversity. Moreover, plant pigments carry rich nutritional and biological functions, such as inducing insect pollination, assisting in seed dispersal, performing biological defense functions, and resisting adverse environmental factors[20]. Currently, natural plant pigments are mainly divided into four categories based on their chemical structures: lipid-soluble tetrapyrrole derivatives primarily including chlorophyll (Fig. 2a); lipid-soluble polyene pigments composed of isoprene units, primarily including carotenoids (Fig. 2b); water-soluble polyphenol pigments composed of polyphenol derivatives, represented by flavonoids (Fig. 2c) and anthocyanins (Fig. 2d); and water-soluble pyridine derivative pigments containing nitrogen heterocycles, represented by betalains (Fig. 2e)[21].

      Figure 2. 

      Chemical structures of four natural plant pigments. (a) Chemical structures of chlorophyll a and b (green). Residue R1 is shown on the right. (b) Chemical structures of carotenes (orange). (c) Chemical structures of flavones and flavonols (yellow), flavone is the core structure for this class of substances. (d) Chemical structures of anthocyanidins. Residues R2, R3 and corresponding color for different type anthocyanidins are listed in the table. (e), (f) Chemical structures of betalains. Composition of residues R4, R5, R6 will produce kinds of betalains. Red groups in (a) − (c) represent the differences of pigments with similar structures.

      In plants, betalains are hydrophilic nitrogen-containing pigments that exist only in the Caryophyllales order, and dragon fruit is the only edible fruit that contains amounts of betalains. Betalains are water-soluble tyrosine-derived alkaloid pigments, chemically known as trimethylamine betaine or trimethylglycine, with a chemical structure similar to methionine and choline, all belonging to the quaternary ammonium alkaloid class[22]. The content of betalains in dragon fruit is an important indicator and parameter determining the harvest time (color) and quality of the fruit[23]. As a natural pigment, betalains not only have the advantages of being non-toxic, edible, and highly safe but also have significant industrial value due to their unique physiological functions and medicinal value[24].

    • Betalains, as a class of natural pigments, not only have advantages such as non-toxicity, edibility, and high safety but also possess significant industrial value due to their unique physiological functions and medicinal properties[25]. However, the stability of natural pigments is relatively poor, which increases the difficulty of their research and reutilization[26]. In dragon fruit, the stability of betalains, including betacyanins and betaxanthins is closely related to factors such as light, temperature, oxygen, pH value, enzymes, water activity, and various metal ions[27,28].

      Betalains exhibit polar and ionizable physicochemical properties in aqueous solutions, so changes in pH affect their stability. Research has found that an appropriate amount of organic acids can enhance the stability of dragon fruit betalains. Acidic conditions (pH 5-6) facilitate the extraction and color protection of betacyanins, whereas under alkaline or slightly alkaline conditions, betalains can undergo irreversible fading due to oxidation-reduction reactions or isomerization reactions[29,30]. Under alkaline conditions, they can decompose into the precursor compound betalamic acid. The polarity of betalains also makes them insoluble in the most organic polar or semi-polar solvents, except for water and mixtures of low-molecular weight alcohols[31,32].

      Additionally, the light and thermal stability of dragon fruit betalains is relatively poor. High temperatures can lead to the degradation of betacyanin, causing the pigment to fade, and even complete loss of color under extreme cases. In contrast to the slow degradation of pigments in darkness, exposure to light accelerates pigment decomposition[3335]. Furthermore, metal ions also affect the stability of betalains. Complexation with metal ions can either darken or lighten the color of betalains. For instance, reductive metal ions such as Fe3+, Al3+, Cu2+, and Cr3+ can accelerate the degradation of betacyanins, leading to a lighter color[3638]. Therefore, various factors affect the stability of betalain pigments, and it is important to manage these factors during processing, application, transportation, and storage to maintain the stability of betalain pigments.

      The unique color presentation of betalains is derived from the conjugated diene of 1,7-diazaheptamethin, giving them the absorption peaks in both the UV and visible light regions[39,40]. Specifically, betacyanins have a maximum absorption value around 535−538 nm, while betaxanthins have a maximum absorption range of 460−480 nm[4143]. Interestingly, at pH < 3, betalains exhibit a color shift effect in the 535−540 nm absorption range, with color deepening in the 575−650 nm range. As the pH increases, betalains may exhibit a bathochromic shift (red shift), where the absorption peak moves to longer wavelengths (lower energy) in alkaline conditions[44,45].

    • Unlike the widely present anthocyanins and carotenoids in the plant kingdom, the distribution of betalains in nature is remarkably limited being found only in a few families of specific lineages. To date, betalains have been confirmed to be mainly present in two major lineages: the Basidiomycota phylum of fungi[46] and the Caryophyllales order of flowering plants[47]. Additionally, studies have found them in the diazotrophic bacteria (Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus)[48]. Betalains serve as the primary pigments in core families of the Caryophyllales order, like Chenopodiaceae[49], Amaranthaceae[50], Cactaceae, and Nyctaginaceae[51,52]. They impart vivid colors to the flower, fruit, peel, and stem of these plants[53,54].

      Interestingly, researchers found a mutual exclusivity between anthocyanins and betalains in core Caryophyllales plants, while anthocyanins and betalains cannot be coexisted in the same plants[5557]. Currently, there is no consensus on the evolutionary reason behind this mutual exclusivity, but recent discoveries have shed some light on this phenomenon. For example: A high frequency of loss of the key late-stage anthocyanin synthesis gene TT19 has been observed in betalains-producing plants, and the recurrent loss of its homologs correlates with the transition to betalains pigment deposition[54,58]. Comparative analysis of DFR and ANS gene expression in betalains-producing and anthocyanin-producing plants revealed that the expression levels of DFR and ANS are nearly nonexistent in most organs and tissues of betalains-producing plants[55]. The R2R3 MYB-type regulator BvMYB1 in betalains-producing plants lacks the important conserved residues for interaction with bHLH, preventing interaction with the bHLH partners in anthocyanin-producing plants, thus inhibiting anthocyanin synthesis[5961]. Although the key steps in betalains biosynthesis are well understood, the unique evolutionary patterns of betalains origin in the Caryophyllales and the molecular mechanisms underlying their mutual exclusivity with anthocyanins still require further elucidation.

    • Betalamic acid, a unique chromophore in betalains pigments found in plants[62], accumulates primarily in vacuoles within plant cells, predominantly in the epidermis and subepidermal tissues of plants[63]. Betalamic acid can form different types of betalains pigments by conjugating with cyclo-DOPA derivatives, amino acids, and amines[64]. Based on the structural characteristics and photochemical properties of the pigment products formed, betalains can be divided into two main classes: red-violet betacyanins and yellow betaxanthins. Betacyanins are formed by the condensation of betalamic acid with cyclo-DOPA, while betaxanthins are derivatives formed by the binding of betalamic acid with various amines and amino acids[65].

      Compared to betacyanins, research on betaxanthins is relatively limited. On one hand, betalamic acid can form different types of betaxanthins by binding with various amino acids. For example, the coloration of Portulaca grandiflora petals includes types such as portulacaxanthin-II (tyrosine-betaxanthin) and portulacaxanthin-III (glycine-betaxanthin)[66]. On the other hand, betalamic acid can bind with amines to produce different colors, such as the color changes observed in Mirabilis jalapa petals with miraxanthin-III (tyramine-betaxanthin) and miraxanthin-V (dopamine-betaxanthin)[67]. Furthermore, studies have shown that expressing genes related to betaxanthin biosynthesis through gene editing and petal-specific methods can enhance the vividness of ornamental plant colors, making it more aesthetically valuable compared to engineering flavonoid biosynthesis[68].

      Betacyanins are primarily derived from various organs of plants such as beetroot[68], purslane fruits[51], globe amaranth[69], and quinoa grains[70]. As edible natural pigments, they find extensive applications in industries such as medical, healthcare, cosmetics, and food processing. Betacyanins can be further classified into seven types based on their chemical structure: betanin-type, amaranthin-type, oleracin-type, apiocactin-type, melocactin-/bougainvillein-r type, gomphrenin-type, and glabranin-/bougainvillein-v type (Fig. 3)[71,72]. Within these frameworks, combining different groups results in more specific color types, for instance, the gomphrenin type produces gomphrenin (gomphrenin I), globosin (gomphrenin II), basellin (gomphrenin III), and gandolin (gomphrenin IV) pigment types[73]. Similarly, amaranthin-types can further differentiate into amaranthin, sinapoyl-amaranthin, argentianin, and celosianin based on functional groups attached to their shared C5 framework[69,7476]. Both betacyanins and betaxanthins can undergo various reactions such as glycosylation, acylation, decarboxylation, and isomerization on their basic frameworks to achieve different color effects ranging from yellow to purple in various plant tissues.

      Figure 3. 

      Schematic pathway of betalains biosynthesis pathway. DODA, DOPA dioxygenase; cD5GT, cyclo-DOPA-5-O-glucosyltransferase; B5GT, betanidin-5-O-glucosyltransferase; B6GT, betanidin-6-Oglucosyltransferase; UDP, uridine-5'-diphosphate. Composition of residues R1-6 forms betaxanthins and seven type betacyanin pigments. The green color highlights the enzymes.

    • Unlike most plants, the content of betacyanins in dragon fruit determines the coloration of both peel and pulp. Due to its high nutritional value, antioxidant capacity, and anti-inflammatory properties, the biosynthesis of betacyanins has become a significant research focus with economic value[77,78]. The biosynthesis of betalains in dragon fruit is as follows.

      In most betacyanin-producing plants, arogenate serves as a precursor, undergoing decarboxylation under the action of ADH (arogenate dehydrogenase) to produce tyrosine[79]. Tyrosine undergoes hydroxylation catalyzed by cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP76AD1 to form L-DOPA (Fig. 3)[80]. L-DOPA undergoes various reactions. Firstly, under the action of DODA (4,5-dopa-extradiol-dioxygenase), L-DOPA is cleaved into the intermediate 4,5-seco-dopa, which then spontaneously forms betalamic acid (Fig. 3)[62]. Secondly, L-DOPA undergoes cyclization to form cyclo-DOPA under the catalysis of CYP76AD1 enzyme (Fig. 3)[81]. The synthesis of betacyanins can be divided into two main types. Betalamic acid can form betaxanthins by binding with different amino acids or amines (Fig. 3), or it can spontaneously form betanidin, a precursor of betacyanins, with cyclo-DOPA (Fig. 3). Cyclo-DOPA, under the action of cDOPA5GT (cD5GT, cyclo-DOPA-5-O-glucosyltransferase), produces cyclo-DOPA-5-O-glucoside, which can also spontaneously form betanin, another precursor of betacyanins. Betanin, after modification by B5GT (betanidin-5-O-glucosyltransferase) and B6GT (betanidin-6-Oglucosyltransferase), forms different types of betacyanins[82,83].

      In summary, betacyanins can be modified and produced into various types of betacyanin pigments, such as glycosylation, acylation, decarboxylation, and isomerization. It is worth noting that decarboxylation primarily involves the degradation of betacyanin pigments and studies have shown the presence of degradation products of mono-, di-, and tri-carboxy betacyanin glycosides in extracts of red beets and dragon fruit[84,85]. Additionally, several transcription factors (TFs) such as HpWRKY44[86], HpERF1/2/3[87], HmoWRKY40[88], BvMYB1[61], and HuMYB1[89] are involved in the regulation of betacyanin biosynthesis. Reported genes and TFs involved in betalains biosynthesis are listed in Table 1.

      Table 1.  Reported genes involved in betalains biosynthesis.

      Gene name Gene Id Gene function Species Ref.
      HuADH1 HU03G02979.1 Arogenate dehydrogenases S. undatus (H. undatus) [23]
      HuYP76AD1-1 HU03G00480.1 Cytochrome P450 enzyme S. undatus (H. undatus) [23]
      HuDODA1 HU03G01342.1 4,5-DOPA extradiol dioxygenase S. undatus (H. undatus) [23]
      HucDOPA5GT1 HU07G00239.1 cyclo-DOPA-5-glucosyltransferase S. undatus (H. undatus) [23]
      HucDOPA5GT2 HU03G00240.1 cyclo-DOPA-5-glucosyltransferase S. undatus (H. undatus) [23]
      HuMYB1 HU01G00040.1 MYB transcription factor, inhibiting the biosynthesis of betalains via suppressing the expression of HuADH1, HuCYP76AD1-1 and HuDODA1 S. undatus (H. undatus) [23]
      HubHLH159 HU11G01328.1
      bHLH transcription factor, promoting betalains biosynthesis by activating the expression of HuADH1, HuCYP76AD1–1, and HuDODA1 S. undatus (H. undatus) [18]
      HpWRKY44 WRKY transcription factor, activates the expreesion of HpCytP450-like1, promoting the biosynthesis of betalains S. monacanthus
      (Hylocereus polyrhizus)
      [86]
      HmoWRKY40 WRKY transcription factor, binding and activating the expression of HmoCYP76AD1 S. monacanthus
      (Hylocereus monacanthus)
      [88]
    • Plant self-incompatibility (SI) is a widely existing reproductive isolation mechanism among flowering plants, formed during their natural evolution to prevent inbreeding and species degeneration, thereby safeguarding genetic diversity[90]. SI can be traced back to over 90 MYA across numerous angiosperm taxa, with currently more than 100 plant families and approximately 40% of plant species employing SI to prevent self-pollination and promote outcrossing[91]. In recent years, SI has increasingly become a hot topic in disciplines such as plant molecular biology and crop breeding, with its applications extending to a growing number of economic crops.

      Studies have shown that SI mechanisms exhibit both independence and diversity. Origin differences exist between SI genes of different genera, and corresponding incompatibility genes also demonstrate heterogeneity[92]. Broadly, based on floral morphology, SI can be categorized into two major types: heteromorphic SI and homomorphic SI. Heteromorphic SI (HSI) plants produce heterostylous flowers that can be further divided into distyly and tristyly types. Distyly type HSI was determined by a single locus, while tristyly is determined by two loci[93]. Homomorphic SI can further be classified into gametophytic self-incompatibility (GSI) and sporophytic self-incompatibility (SSI) based on differences in the genetic control of pollen self-incompatibility trait. Within the SSI mechanism, the male determinants are predominantly expressed in diploid anthers, resulting in haploid pollen grains showing a diploid S phenotype, prevalent in more than ten plant families such as Brassicaceae and Asteraceae, with extensive research in Brassica[94,95]. In contrast, most plants in nature exhibit GSI, found in families like Rutaceae, Rosaceae, Solanaceae, Papaveraceae, Plantaginaceae, Poaceae, Commelinaceae, and Ranunculaceae[96100]. GSI, the most common form of SI, has been molecularly characterized by two distinct types of S genes and SI mechanisms. One type is the RNase-based SI, where the female determinant S-RNase and the male determinant F-box protein operate. In this mechanism, non-S-locus acts as a necessary factor, where under incompatible conditions, S-RNases enter self-pollen tubes to degrade pollen RNA through their inherent cytotoxic enzyme activity, thereby inhibiting pollen tube growth. The other GSI mechanism is calcium ion-based self-incompatibility, where the female determinant (PrsS) is a small secreted peptide and the male determinant (PrpS) is a transmembrane receptor. Interaction between PrsS and incompatible pollen triggers a signaling pathway, leading to rapid actin depolymerization, pollen tube inhibition, and programmed cell death, currently found exclusively in Papaveraceae[101103].

      Dragon fruit exhibits typical physiological structures that prevent self-pollination, such as protruding style and stamens shorter than the style, demonstrating self-incompatibility[104]. After self-pollination, pollen germination on the stigma is observed, but internal pollen tube growth is inhibited, illustrating typical GSI of dragon fruit[104,105]. Comparative analysis of GSI between white-fleshed (S. undatus) and red-fleshed (S. costaricensis) dragon fruit reveals stronger SI in red-fleshed varieties, while white-fleshed varieties exhibit relatively weaker SI[106]. Further studies indicate that intense SI in S. monacanthus suppresses pollen tube growth in the ovary, leading to fertilization failure, whereas SI between S. undatus and S. megalanthus is less pronounced[107]. Due to the impact of SI, dragon fruit exhibits low natural pollination and fruit set during cultivation, necessitating biological and artificial pollination methods, thereby increasing labor and cost resources in dragon fruit production, and hindering its commercial promotion[108]. Currently, the GSI mechanism of dragon fruit has not been extensively studied, and the related pollen S-RNase and S proteins have yet to be fully elucidated. Researchers analyzed the SI of dragon fruit varieties 'Kyoto 1' (self-compatible) and 'Cu Sha' (self-incompatible) and preliminarily identified HuS-RNase2 as a candidate gene in the GSI system, involved in the recognition process between pollen and stigma[19].

    • Dragon fruit, as the most economically valuable tropical edible fruit in the Cactaceae family possesses characteristics of low energy, high fiber, and high nutritional health value. Its unique appearance, rich nutritional composition, and health benefits have made it increasingly accepted and loved by consumers. In recent years, researchers have explored multiple areas related to dragon fruit. For instance, comparative metabolomic analysis has identified various organic compounds, active substances, and antioxidants in two main dragon fruit crops, S. undatus, and S. monacanthus[5,109]. Proteomics-based studies have elucidated the molecular mechanisms betalains biosynthesis during the white pulp and red pulp stages in S. monacanthus and the antioxidant signaling pathways in S. undatus[110,111]. Single-cell sequencing has revealed the developmental trajectory of dragon fruit peel during aging and identified early marker genes for fruit resistance[112,113]. Furthermore, numerous studies have reported on transcriptomics around growth, development, flowering mechanisms in Selenicereus species, betalains biosynthesis, responses to abiotic stress, antioxidative properties, and plant pathology mechanisms[78,114118]. With technological advancements, there is potential for deeper genomic, population genetic, functional genomics, and metabolic studies on global dragon fruit germplasm resources[119]. This research aims to elucidate the molecular and evolutionary mechanisms underlying biological characteristics such as nocturnal flowering, self-incompatibility, betalains biosynthesis regulation, nutritional flavors, and others. These efforts will provide richer genetic resources and practical tools for precise dragon fruit breeding[120].

      • This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hainan Province (321RC1031) and Guangxi Key R&D Program Projects (2023AB17031).

      • The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Ding Y, Lu G, Hu H; data collection: Li P, Li Z, Yao H; analysis and interpretation of results: Ding Y, Li P; manuscript preparation: Ding Y, Li P; manuscript midification: Ma X, Lu G, Hu H. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • All data synthesized and analyzed during this review are available within the article.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Received 20 August 2024; Accepted 17 October 2024; Published online 12 December 2024

      • Copyright: © 2024 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press on behalf of Hainan University. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (3)  Table (1) References (120)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Li P, Ma X, Li Z, Yao H, Lu G, et al. 2024. A review on the advances of dragon fruit. Tropical Plants 3: e041 doi: 10.48130/tp-0024-0041
    Li P, Ma X, Li Z, Yao H, Lu G, et al. 2024. A review on the advances of dragon fruit. Tropical Plants 3: e041 doi: 10.48130/tp-0024-0041

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return