-
Canola oil (61% monounsaturated, 32% polyunsaturated and 7% saturated) was purchased from the local supermarket (Durango, México) without further purification. Guar gum was purchased from Habacuq Comercializadora Química S.A de C.V. (Guadalajara, Jal, México). Myverol (18-04 PK) is a mixture of monoglycerides (mainly 49% glycerol monostearate, 48% glycerol monopalmitate and 3% calcium silicate) kindly provided by Kerry (SW food technology, SA de CV, Nuevo Leon, Mexico).
The surfactant PGPR (E 476), which is a complex mixture of partial esters of polyglycerol with linearly esterified polyricinoleic acid derived from castor oil, was purchased from Palsgaard (San Luis Potosí, Mexico). Polyoxyethylene sorbitan monostearate (Tween 60) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Toluca, México).
Bigel preparation
-
Oleogels were prepared by dissolving myverol (10%, w/w) in canola oil (88.5% w/w) and PGPR as surfactant (1.5% w/w) under agitation at 80°C until complete solubilization following the method reported by Isaac Contreras-Ramírez et al[26]. The guar gum hydrogel (1%, w/w) was produced by dispersing the guar gum into distilled water under constant magnetic stirring at 80 °C for 1 h. Tween 60 was added to the water phase at 1.7% (w/w) under magnetic stirring. After that, the oil solution was cooled to 50 °C.
The bigels were prepared by incorporating the oleogel into the hydrogel and mixed at different ratios (67:33, 83:17; 85:15), followed by stirring at two different rates (600 and 800 rpm) for 20 min with an Ultra Turrax homogenizer (T25, IKA, Germany). Then the mixtures were cooled to room temperature, to trigger the structuring of oil phase and water phase. The obtained bigels were subsequently stored at 4 °C for further analysis.
Texture analysis
-
TA.TX plus texture analyzer (Texture Technologies Corp, New York, USA) was used to analyze the texture of the samples. Briefly, the instrument was calibrated (5 kg) and a penetration test was performed using a P20 cylindrical probe (aluminum probe, 20 mm diameter). A sample (50 g) of each formulation was placed in a container (35 mm diameter and 90 mm height) to a height of 35 mm. The probe penetrated at 5 mm·s−1 for 15 mm and returned to its initial position. From the force/time graph, the firmness value (maximum positive peak of the curve) was calculated following the method described by Pérez-Salas et al[27].
Thermal analysis
-
The differential scanning calorimeter DSC (TA Instruments, DE, USA) was used to analyze the thermal properties of bigel samples. About 10–15 mg of each bigel sample was sealed in aluminum pans with lids, an empty aluminum pan was used as a control. The thermal profile was determined in the cycle heating/cooling temperature into the range of 20 to 80 °C at a rate of 10 °C min−1 under nitrogen atmosphere, (flow rate of 10 mL·min−1).
Rheological analysis
-
Steady shear tests were carried out in a DHR-III rheometer (TA-Instrument, Delaware, USA), at a temperature of 25 °C, in a shear rate range of 0.1 to 100 s−1, with rough parallel plate geometry. The results were adjusted to the (Ostwald-de-Waale) power law model, using the ARES software (TA-Instrument, Delaware, USA). The evaluation of the linear viscoelasticity range was carried out in all the samples by means of a strain sweep in a range of 0.1% to 100%.
For oscillatory test It was carried out in a DHR-III rheometer (TA-Instrument, Delaware, USA), at room temperature and a geometry of rough parallel plate geometry 40 mm with 1,000 µm gap[28,29].
Creep–Compliance tests were performed on the bigels following the methodology proposed by Ojeda-Serna et al[30]. Ten Pa of stress was applied, and the response registered by 180 s, after that, force was retired, and compliance registered. The obtained results were modelling using the Burgers model.
Cox-Merz rule
-
The superimposition of the shear rate dependence of steady shear viscosity, and the frequency dependence of complex viscosity, η*(ω), at equal values of frequency and shear rate was carried out using the Cox–Merz rule[23]:
$ \eta *(w) = \eta ({\text γ})│w= {\text γ} $ (1) Where η* is complex viscosity, w is the frequency, η is the viscosity, γ is the shear rate.
This rule provides insight on the structure of materials. Deviation from Cox–Merz rule is an indication of structural heterogeneity in materials[31].
Statistical analysis
-
Data analysis was performed using the ANOVA test and mean comparison tests using the Tukey method (p < 0.05). The determination of parameters of the model used was obtained by non-linear estimation, using the Levenberg-Marquadt method, using the Statistica 12 software (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK, USA).
-
Results of the texture analysis are shown in Table 1. Firmness was defined as the maximum value of force in a plot of force vs time (positive peak), while the cohesiveness, was defined as the maximum value of the force in the negative peak arising during the movement of the probe upwards[27], this value could be used as the main parameter pointer of sample adhesion ability[5].
Table 1. Firmness and cohesiveness values of the bigels obtained at the different `proportions of hydrocolloid/oleogel at different agitation rates and mixing time.
Hydrocolloid/
oleogelAgitation
(rpm)Mixing
time (min)Firmness
(N)Cohesiveness
(N)67:33 11,200 5 1.19 ± 0.10ab −0.66 ± 0.001ab 67:33 11,200 7 1.48 ± 0.10ab −0.73 ± 0.030ab 67:33 15,600 5 1.60 ± 0.03b −0.76 ± 0.010b 67:33 15,600 7 1.55 ± 0.18ab −0.69 ± 0.120ab 83:17 11,200 5 0.88 ± 0.04ª −0.43 ± 0.020ab 83:17 11,200 7 0.92 ± 0.16ab −0.42 ± 0.090ª 83:17 15,600 5 1.02 ± 0.12ab −0.48 ± 0.010ab 83:17 15,600 7 1.03 ± 0.11ab −0.48 ± 0.040ab Data shown are the mean of three replicates ± standard deviation; different literals in the same column indicates statistical differences (p < 0.05, Tukey test). Thermal analysis
-
Results obtained by DSC analysis of bigels are showed in Table 2, the value of melting temperature was influenced only for the interaction of hydrogel/oleogel × mixing rate (p < 0.05), Highest melting point (Tm) (2.2 °C) was obtained at 67:33 hydrogel/oleogel ratio and 15,600 rpm.
Table 2. Calorimetric behavior (melting, crystallization) of the bigels obtained at the different proportions of hydrocolloid/oleogel at different agitation rates and mixing time.
Hydrocolloid/
oleogelAgitation
(rpm)Mixing time
(min)Melting point
(Tm) (°C)Melting enthalphy
(Kcal/mol)Crystallization point
(°C)Crystallization enthalphy
(Kcal/mol)67:33 11,200 5 0.9 ± 0.1 66.32 ± 17.43 −20.1 ± 0.3 75.99 ± 15.41 67:33 11,200 7 1.5 ± 0.2 133.15 ± 19.15 −16.6 ± 0.7 128.06 ± 11.74 67:33 15,600 5 1.9 ± 0.2 141.85 ± 13.35 −14.5 ± 0.2 129.40 ± 12.30 67:33 15,600 7 2.2 ± 0.6 164.05 ± 17.25 −13.8 ± 0.3 143.70 ± 13.80 83:17 11,200 5 1.5 ± 0.2 192.70 ± 23.80 −16.8 ± 0.1 163.40 ± 18.90 83:17 11,200 7 1.4 ± 0.1 201.10 ± 28.40 −17.0 ± 0.7 174.80 ± 17.40 83:17 15,600 5 0.9 ± 0.1 59.34 ± 15.75 −18.3 ± 0.2 86.50 ± 15.81 83:17 15,600 7 1.4 ± 0.3 195.6 ± 11.00 −15.7 ± 0.7 151.25 ± 20.15 Data shown are the mean of three replicates ± standard deviation; different literals in the same column indicates statistical differences (p < 0.05, Tukey test). Rheological behavior
Creep-Compliance
-
The Burgers model use Maxwell and Kelvin elements to study viscoelastic properties of the material, in short, G0 is a measurement of the sample resistance to deformation occurring immediately during the deformation profile. G0 is instantaneously recovered once the stress is removed. G1 is the contribution of the retarded elastic region to the total compliance; η0 is the residual viscosity or viscous flow of the system after suffering deformation, and η1 is the internal viscosity.[31]
$ J\left(t\right)=\frac{1}{Go}+\frac{1}{{G}_{1}}\left[1\right.-\mathrm{exp}\left(\frac{-t{G}_{1}}{{\eta }_{1}}\right)]+t/{\eta }_{0} $ (2) where G0 is the instantaneous elastic modulus of the Maxwell unit, G1 is the elastic modulus of Kelvin–Voigt. The dashpot of the Maxwell element represents the residual viscosity, η0, and the dashpot associated with Kelvin–Voigt is called the internal viscosity, η1. Parameters Go, G1. All parameters yielded values of r2 ≥ 0.94, which can be considered satisfactory (Table 3).
Table 3. Parameters of Burgers model of bigels at the different conditions of ratio hydrogel (H)/Oleogel (O), mixing rate, time of agitation.
Ratio H/O Rate (rpm) Time (min) Recovery (%) G0 Pa μ0 Pa s G1 Pa μ1 Pa s λ s R2 67:33 11,200 5 47.63 10.54 978.55 8.85 18.51 2.09 0.96 67:33 11,200 7 48.06 6.65 709.00 7.62 15.69 2.06 0.94 67:33 15,600 5 33.00 6.78 919.13 8.78 11.13 1.27 0.93 67:33 15,600 7 60.04 18.91 852.74 7.79 33.29 4.27 0.98 83:17 11,200 5 48.41 5.03 575.48 5.71 7.65 1.34 0.92 83:17 11,200 7 76.11 29.82 581.34 6.48 41.06 6.34 0.99 83:17 15,600 5 67.33 53.11 577.18 6.63 50.40 7.60 0.99 83:17 15,600 7 66.08 71.22 1402.51 20.12 174.16 8.65 0.99 Data shown are the mean of three replicates ± standard deviation. Cox-Mertz
-
Superposition of data from shear viscosity and complex viscosity was observed over the wide shear rate and/or frequency range for all samples, as illustrated in Fig. 1.
-
JDMM acknowledges Conacyt for their scholarship.
-
About this article
Cite this article
Mata-Mota JD, Gallegos-Infante JA, Pérez-Martínez JD, Rocha-Guzmán NE, González-Laredo RF. 2023. Effect of hydrogel/oleogel ratio, speed and time of mixing, on the mechanical properties of bigel materials and the application of Cox-Merz rule. Food Materials Research 3:24 doi: 10.48130/FMR-2023-0024
Effect of hydrogel/oleogel ratio, speed and time of mixing, on the mechanical properties of bigel materials and the application of Cox-Merz rule
- Received: 08 July 2023
- Accepted: 28 August 2023
- Published online: 11 October 2023
Abstract: Bigels, are materials that combine hydrogels and oleogels. However, a major problem with them is the characterization of a single material compound by two materials that have different physical characteristics. The objective of this research was to evaluate the effect of the mixing time, the interaction of ratio hydrogel/oleogel, mixing rate and the applicability of Cox-Merz rule in bigels. Bigels were obtained blending monoglycerides, canola oil for oleogel phas, esters of polyglycerol with linearly esterified polyricinoleic acid, Polyoxyethylene sorbitan monostearate (Tween 60), guar gum and water. The bigels were prepared by incorporating the oleogel into the hydrogel and mixed at different ratios (67:33, 83:17; 85:15), followed by stirring at two different rate (600 and 800 rpm) for 20 min. Firmness was evaluated for all experimental samples. Thermal scanning was done by DSC. Steady Shear and Oscillatory test were carried out on the samples. Creep- Compliance test, and Cox-Merz rule were used for data analysis. Texture analysis indicated that a higher level of oleogel in the bigel, diminished firmness, however, major differences were observed between samples at low rate of agitation and high time of mixing. The creep test was modeled by Burgers model with good fit (R2 > 0.9). High recovery (66–67%) was observed at lower presence of oleogels and high mixing rate. Data of steady shear and oscillatory shear were adjusted to empirical Cox-Merz rule with good fit at low shear rate (> 10 s−1).
-
Key words:
- Mechanical /
- Properties /
- Bigel /
- Hydrogels /
- Oleoogel